Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 150035
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T09:13:34+00:00 2026-05-11T09:13:34+00:00

The standard way to capture command output in Bourne shell is to use the

  • 0

The standard way to capture command output in Bourne shell is to use the $() syntax:

output=$(mycommand) 

For commands that have a lot of output, however, this requires the shell allocate memory for the whole thing as one long string. I’d prefer to find something that does the moral equivalent of the Unix C function popen, to get a new file descriptor I could read from:

newfd=popen(mycommand) while read -u $newfd LINE; do   #process output done 

Is this even possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T09:13:35+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:13 am
    #!bash ls | while read X do      echo  $X is a directory entry done 

    Replace ‘ls’ with the command of your choice

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there some standard way or has anyone written something that allows you to
I would like to capture the output of the time command (which writes to
So I have been doing a lot of reading about the way iOS handles
Is there a standard way to read an XML file from a website that
Inside my main Extension I have this standard way of instantiating a Calculator. This
For maven, we can use mvn eclispe:eclipse to do it. Any standard way if
Is there a standard way to convert an XSD to an input form (ASP.NET
I know the standard way of using the null coalescing operator in C# is
What is the standard way of incorporating helper/utility functions in Obj-C classes? I.e. General
Is there a standard way to do an fopen with a Unicode string file

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.