Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 824587
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:07:15+00:00 2026-05-15T03:07:15+00:00

The title is a bit difficult to put together for this question. Say I

  • 0

The title is a bit difficult to put together for this question.

Say I have two models, Foo and Bar. Foo has many Bar’s. Bar belongs to one Foo. How do I use Foo.find to find all of the Foos that currently have zero Bars? In SQL this would translate into something like:

SELECT * from foo where id NOT IN (select foo_id from bar);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:07:15+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:07 am

    Foo.all(:conditions => ["id NOT IN (?)", Bar.all.map(&:foo_id)]) will do it, though there are likely optimizations you can take from there.

    If there are speed concerns with this, you might want to look into using a counter cache, which would turn the query into Foo.find_all_by_bars_count(0)

    Documentation on counter caches is here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Was little bit difficult to formulate the title for my question since is kind
The title is a bit weird, so let me clarify. I have two objects,
My question title sounds a little bit difficult - sorry. I'm new in MEF
This was a bit difficult to explain in the title, but I should be
The question title is a bit strange because I'm not exactly sure how to
Although the question title appears a bit subjective I am sure there is not
I wasn't sure how to phrase this so the title is a bit cryptic.
the title might be a little bit confusing, let me explain, ;) I have
Sorry for the title.....bit difficult to word what I really want to ask. Some
The title is a bit confusing but here's what I'm after: I have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.