Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1073407
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T20:59:19+00:00 2026-05-16T20:59:19+00:00

There is a useful Ruby idiom that uses tap which allows you to create

  • 0

There is a useful Ruby idiom that uses tap which allows you to create an object, do some operations on it and return it (I use a list here only as an example, my real code is more involved):

def foo
  [].tap do |a|
    b = 1 + 2
    # ... and some more processing, maybe some logging, etc.
    a << b
  end
end

>> foo
=> [1]

With Rails there’s a similar method called returning, so you can write:

def foo
  returning([]) do |a|
    b = 1 + 2
    # ... and some more processing, maybe some logging, etc.
    a << b
  end
end

which speaks for itself. No matter how much processing you do on the object, it’s still clear that it’s the return value of the function.

In Python I have to write:

def foo():
  a = []
  b = 1 + 2
  # ... and some more processing, maybe some logging, etc.
  a.append(b)
  return a

and I wonder if there is a way to port this Ruby idiom into Python. My first thought was to use with statement, but return with is not valid syntax.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T20:59:20+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:59 pm

    You can implement it in Python as follows:

    def tap(x, f):
        f(x)
        return x
    

    Usage:

    >>> tap([], lambda x: x.append(1))
    [1]
    

    However it won’t be so much use in Python 2.x as it is in Ruby because lambda functions in Python are quite restrictive. For example you can’t inline a call to print because it is a keyword, so you can’t use it for inline debugging code. You can do this in Python 3.x although it isn’t as clean as the Ruby syntax.

    >>> tap(2, lambda x: print(x)) + 3
    2
    5
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there any sorts of useful idioms I can make use of when writing
Are there any c++ networking libs that are very useful and robust? and libs
I have heard that there is lots of interesting and useful WSGI middleware around.
This is something that I think would be very useful. Basically, I'd like there
Possible Duplicate: Idiomatic object creation in ruby Sometimes it's useful to assign numerous of
In JavaScript there's a useful way to test for a variable which has never
Is there something like JRuby but for Ruby and Python? Not that it would
i wonder if there are tutorials that go through the syntax differences for ruby
I wonder if there are Ruby snippets for various design patterns you can use
I notice in several API's, that you may create a struct which is used

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.