Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7031405
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T00:47:56+00:00 2026-05-28T00:47:56+00:00

There is this code: #include <iostream> class KlasaNiePOD{ public: int a; ~KlasaNiePOD(){} }; int

  • 0

There is this code:

#include <iostream>

class KlasaNiePOD{
public:
    int a;
    ~KlasaNiePOD(){}

};
int main() {
    KlasaNiePOD obiekt1; // first case
    std::cout << obiekt1.a << std::endl; // -1075234152
    KlasaNiePOD obiekt2 = KlasaNiePOD(); // second case
    std::cout << obiekt2.a << std::endl; // 0
    return 0;
} 

Why in the first case ‘a’ is not initialized, but in second case it is? Shouldn’t be called constructor always in non-POD classes?

Edit:

Fragment from assembly:

.globl main
    .type   main, @function
main:
.LFB960:
    .cfi_startproc
    .cfi_personality 0x0,__gxx_personality_v0
    .cfi_lsda 0x0,.LLSDA960
    pushl   %ebp
    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    .cfi_offset 5, -8
    .cfi_def_cfa_register 5
    andl    $-16, %esp
    pushl   %esi
    pushl   %ebx
    subl    $40, %esp
    movl    28(%esp), %eax
    movl    %eax, 4(%esp)
    movl    $_ZSt4cout, (%esp) # std::cout << obiekt1.a << std::endl;
.LEHB0:
    .cfi_escape 0x10,0x3,0x7,0x55,0x9,0xf0,0x1a,0x9,0xf8,0x22
    .cfi_escape 0x10,0x6,0x7,0x55,0x9,0xf0,0x1a,0x9,0xfc,0x22
    call    _ZNSolsEi
    movl    $_ZSt4endlIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_, 4(%esp)
    movl    %eax, (%esp)
    call    _ZNSolsEPFRSoS_E
.LEHE0:
    movl    $0, 24(%esp) # Here obiekt2.a = 0
    movl    24(%esp), %eax
    movl    %eax, 4(%esp)
    movl    $_ZSt4cout, (%esp) # std::cout << obiekt2.a << std::endl;
.LEHB1:
    call    _ZNSolsEi
    movl    $_ZSt4endlIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_, 4(%esp)
    movl    %eax, (%esp)
    call    _ZNSolsEPFRSoS_E
.LEHE1:
    movl    $0, %ebx
    leal    24(%esp), %eax
    movl    %eax, (%esp)
    call    _ZN11KlasaNiePODD1Ev
    leal    28(%esp), %eax
    movl    %eax, (%esp)
    call    _ZN11KlasaNiePODD1Ev
    movl    %ebx, %eax
    addl    $40, %esp
    popl    %ebx
    popl    %esi
    movl    %ebp, %esp
    popl    %ebp
    ret
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T00:47:57+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 12:47 am
    KlasaNiePOD obiekt1; // first case
    

    This is default-initialised; since it doesn’t have a default constructor, members with a fundamental type (which includes numeric types) are left uninitialised.

    KlasaNiePOD obiekt2 = KlasaNiePOD(); // second case
    

    The temporary KlasaNiePOD() is value-initialised; since it doesn’t have a default constructor, members with a numeric type are initialised to zero.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There is this code: #include <iostream> class Base { public: Base(){ std::cout << Constructor
There is this code: #include <iostream> class Bazowa { int x; public: Bazowa() :
There is this code: #include <iostream> class SomeClass { int someInteger; float someFloat; public:
There is such code: #include <iostream> class A{ public: friend void fun(A a){std::cout <<
There is this code: #include <iostream> class Base { int x; }; class Derived
There is this code: #include <iostream> class CleverClass{ public: CleverClass() : number(55){} void cleverOperation(){
I have this code: #include <iostream> using namespace std; class FooA { public: virtual
There is code: #include <iostream> class Int { public: Int() : x(0) {} Int(int
There is such code: #include <iostream> class A { public: int a; A() :
There is such C++ code: #include <iostream> class MojaKlasa{ public: int z; void fun(){

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.