Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8506355
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T02:34:17+00:00 2026-06-11T02:34:17+00:00

This article discusses possible ways CQL 3 could be used for creating composite columns

  • 0

This article discusses possible ways CQL 3 could be used for creating composite columns in Cassandra 1.1. They are just ideas. Nothing is official, and the Datastax documentation doesn’t cover this (only composite keys).

As I understand it, composite columns are a number of columns that together have only one value.

How do you create them with CQL?

EDIT

I will be using C# to interface into Cassandra. CQL looks straightforward to use, which is why I want to use it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T02:34:19+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 2:34 am

    You’ve got a couple concepts confused, I think. Quite possibly this is the fault of the Datastax documentation; if you have any good suggestions for making it clearer after you have a better picture, I’ll be glad to send them on.

    The “composite keys” stuff in the Datastax docs is actually talking about composite Cassandra columns. The reason for the confusion is that rows in CQL 3 do not map directly to storage engine rows (what you work with when you use the thrift interface). “Composite key” in the context of a CQL table just means a primary key which consists of multiple columns, which is implemented by composite columns at the storage layer.

    This article is one of the better explanations as to how the mapping happens and why the CQL model is generally easier to think about.

    With this sort of use, the first CQL column becomes being the storage engine partition key.

    As of Cassandra 1.2 (in development), it’s also possible to create composite storage engine keys using CQL, by putting extra parentheses in the PRIMARY KEY definition around the CQL columns that will be stored in the partition key (see CASSANDRA-4179), but that’s probably going to be the exception, not the rule.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just read this article: http://www.acunetix.com/websitesecurity/upload-forms-threat.htm which discusses some of the security risks involved
This cool article briefly discusses no-content style elements. Particularities include that they don't have
In this article the author discusses the use of \@ to put correct spacings
I'm very surprised this issue hasn't been discussed in-depth: This article tells us how
I am building CLR Stored Procedures and UDFs as discussed in this article: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/CLR_Stored_Procedure.aspx
This article on memory leaks emphasizes that having superfluous event listeners leads to memory
This article explains how to correct an exception that's often seen when switching an
This article from Microsoft details how to implement transport security with an anonymous client
This article on MSDN states that you can use as many try catch blocks
this article suggests you can use Color c = Color.decode(FF0096); however this understandably throws

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.