Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8110813
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T01:53:21+00:00 2026-06-06T01:53:21+00:00

This article on memory leaks emphasizes that having superfluous event listeners leads to memory

  • 0

This article on memory leaks emphasizes that having superfluous event listeners leads to memory leaks in the Google Closure javascript library.

http://www.googleclosure.com/avoid-memory-leaks-with-goog-disposable/

Why event listeners in particular?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T01:53:23+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 1:53 am

    Since the library stores your handlers internally, the handlers will be kept there unless you explicitly remove them. There is no way for the library to know whenever you are not using some instance of a class anymore.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have gone through the article http://developer.android.com/resources/articles/avoiding-memory-leaks.html . In this article it is suggested
I have gone through the article http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/01/avoiding-memory-leaks.html . In this article it is suggested
This article on MSDN states that you can use as many try catch blocks
After reading this article on thedailywtf.com, I'm not sure that I really got the
I was reading this article on MSDN Managing Heap Memory in Win32 And in
I found this article here: Quantifying the Performance of Garbage Collection vs. Explicit Memory
I came across this article on Code Project that talks about using an abstract
I read the Avoiding Memory Leaks article with interest, and am concerned about danging
I read this article which is about Managing heap memory written by Randy Kath.
We are having problems with a WCF services call that is leaking memory. In

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.