Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 67893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T19:19:52+00:00 2026-05-10T19:19:52+00:00

This article gives a good overview on why structured exception handling is bad. Is

  • 0

This article gives a good overview on why structured exception handling is bad. Is there a way to get the robustness of stopping your server from crashing, while getting past the problems mentioned in the article?

I have a server software that runs about 400 connected users concurrently. But if there is a crash all 400 users are affected. We added structured exception handling and enjoyed the results for a while, but eventually had to remove it because of some crashes causing the whole server to hang (which is worse than just having it crash and restart itself).

So we have this:

  • With SEH: only 1 user of the 400 get a problem for most crashes
  • Without SEH: If any user gets a crash, all 400 are affected.
  • But sometimes with SEH: Server hangs, all 400 are affected and future users that try to connect.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T19:19:53+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 7:19 pm

    Break your program up into worker processes and a single server process. The server process will handle initial requests and then hand them off the the worker processes. If a worker process crashes, only the users on that worker are affected. Don’t use SEH for general exception handling – as you have found out, it can and will leave you wide open to deadlocks, and you can still crash anyway.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 68k
  • Answers 68k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Try the ImageStat module. If the values returned by extrema… May 11, 2026 at 12:16 pm
  • added an answer List comprehensions. In Python they look something like: a =… May 11, 2026 at 12:16 pm
  • added an answer Aha! I had an old version of the Python readline… May 11, 2026 at 12:15 pm

Related Questions

This article gives a good overview on why structured exception handling is bad. Is
This article describes a way, in C#, to allow the addition of arbitrary value
This article here suggests to use -XX:+UseParNewGC To enable a parallel young generation GC
This article states that If your site is run on a shared Web server,
Taking this article on classes and structs as an example: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173109.aspx namespace ProgrammingGuide {
I came across this article written by Andrei Alexandrescu and Petru Marginean many years
I was reading this article about Double-Checked locking and out of the main topic
I read in this article that a company has created a software capable of
According to this article Silverlight 2 Beta 2 supports the DataContractJsonSerializer object. But, when
LearnWPF.com posted this article about converting bitmap images to XAML and using them in

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.