Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 718995
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T05:35:30+00:00 2026-05-14T05:35:30+00:00

This article says: Every prime number can be expressed as 30k±1 , 30k±7 ,

  • 0

This article says:

Every prime number can be expressed as
30k±1, 30k±7, 30k±11, or
30k±13 for some k.
That means we can use eight bits per
thirty numbers to store all the
primes; a million primes can be
compressed to 33,334 bytes


“That means we can use eight bits per thirty numbers to store all the primes”

This “eight bits per thirty numbers” would be for k, correct? But each k value will not necessarily take-up just one bit. Shouldn’t it be eight k values instead?


“a million primes can be compressed to 33,334 bytes”

I am not sure how this is true.

We need to indicate two things:

  • VALUE of k (can be arbitrarily large)

  • STATE from one of the eight states (-13,-11,-7,-1,1,7,11,13)

I am not following how “33,334 bytes” was arrived at, but I can say one thing: as the prime numbers become larger and larger in value, we will need more space to store the value of k.

How, then can we fix it at “33,334 bytes”?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T05:35:31+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 5:35 am

    You don’t need to store each value of k. If you want to store the prime numbers below 1 million, use 33,334 bytes – the first byte corresponds to k=0, the second to k=1 etc. Then, in each byte, use 1 bit to indicate “prime” or “composite” for 30k+1, 30k+7 etc.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This article on MSDN states that you can use as many try catch blocks
This article says that you need to use resizable MemoryStreams when working with the
According to this article , it says: Use a delegate in the following circumstances:
this article suggests you can use Color c = Color.decode(FF0096); however this understandably throws
Every article or question I've seen pretty much says, just use: str.replace(/yourstring/g, 'whatever'); But
Almost every article I read told me that you can't have chdir in Java.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/javase/index-140168.html#binsch - This article says JAXB requires that the XML document you want to
I have read from this article http://codahale.com/how-to-safely-store-a-password/ and it says using a salt isn't
As per this MSDN article: W3C Extended Log File Format (IIS 6.0) It says
This article on memory leaks emphasizes that having superfluous event listeners leads to memory

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.