Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 704049
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T03:53:53+00:00 2026-05-14T03:53:53+00:00

This is probably a silly question, but here it goes.Imagine you have the following

  • 0

This is probably a silly question, but here it goes.Imagine you have the following classes:

public class C
{
}

public class D : C
{
     //A subclass of C
}

public class A
{
    C argument;     
}

Now, I want to have a class B, that inherits from A.This class would obviously inherit the “argument” field, but I wish to force the “argument” field in B to be of type D, rather than C.Since D inherits from C this shouldn’t create any problems.
So, how would achieve this in c# ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T03:53:54+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:53 am

    As Jared points out, this is not possible. However, it is interesting to consider why not.

    Suppose the field is private. Then it cannot be accessed in derived class B. (Assuming B is not a nested type of A.)

    Suppose the field is not private. Doesn’t matter whether it is public, internal, protected or protected internal. Suppose its public and this were legal. Now you have the following situation.

    class B : A 
    {
        override public D argument; // "overrides" A.argument
    }
    
    class E : C {  }
    
    class F
    {
        public static void M(A a)
        { a.argument = new E(); }
    }
    
    ... 
    F.M(new B());
    

    And hey, you just crashed the runtime. You just wrote an object of type E into a field that can only store type D. (We could make similar crashing scenarios for other configurations, like protected fields, and so on.)

    Now, you might say, well, instead let me make a read-only property. That I can virtualize:

    class A 
    {
        public virtual C Argument { get; }
    }
    class B : A
    {
        public override D Argument { ... }
    }
    

    Now the problems go away. The public interface isn’t writable, so there’s no problem with someone writing something in there that is not supported. And the property is virtual, so there’s a mechanism for overriding it.

    That feature is called “return type covariance”, and it is not supported in C# either. See Why the concept of "Covariance" and "Contravariance" are applicable while implementing the methods of an interface?.

    Please explain what you are really trying to do, not how you’re trying to do it. There is probably a better way.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is probably a silly question but here goes: I like to be able
Probably a silly question here but I have been trying to find this for
This is probably a silly question but I have been thinking it over for
This is probably a silly question, but I'm following a videocast about Rails, right
This is probably a silly question, but i could't figure it out. I have
This is probably silly but I don't have enough Elisp knowledge to understand what
This is the weirdest bug! It is probably something silly, but I have no
This is probably a really silly question but, given the example code at the
This is quite probably a very silly question but I need to be sure.
This is probably a silly question, but I am trying to stuff an anonymous

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.