Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6015791
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T02:53:13+00:00 2026-05-23T02:53:13+00:00

This is probably a very generic question but I will shoot anyway since I

  • 0

This is probably a very generic question but I will shoot anyway since I need honest advice. I have a very simple library which is mostly threadsafe due to most clases being immutable. However, I have 2-3 classes which are not and I cannot modify them.

This library is extensively used with a Async HTTP client. It works like this. The client is instantiated with an observer. The observer handles all the complete, fail or loading events. The observer also calls the necessary functions from this other lib.

I am using the Async HTTP client almost like it runs in a single thread with non-blocking io. However, underneath, the client uses thread pools.

My question is: if I make all the handler methods in the observer synchronized, will that resolve all other thread safety issues?

For example, we have the following setup.

Client -> calls methods from the
   Observer
      synchronized onLoaded -> calls thread unsafe code
      synchronized onError -> calls thread unsafe code
      synchronized onCompleted -> calls thread unsafe code

If this doesn’t make sense, is it possible somehow to execute all the code within these methods on the main thread and as such achieve the non-blocking io design I am trying to follow?

CLARIFICATIONS: I know that the Async HTTP lib is thread based and blocking but the rest of the code is not… everything is based around event.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T02:53:14+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 2:53 am

    Other than adding the synchronized, check if those three (2) methods are not modifies class fields. if yes, you may use ThreadLocal.

    Usage: uniqueNum is class field but it declares with ThreadLocal. So it is safe.

     import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
    
     public class UniqueThreadIdGenerator {
    
         private static final AtomicInteger uniqueId = new AtomicInteger(0);
    
         private static final ThreadLocal < Integer > uniqueNum = 
             new ThreadLocal < Integer > () {
                 @Override protected Integer initialValue() {
                     return uniqueId.getAndIncrement();
             }
         };
    
         public static int getCurrentThreadId() {
             return uniqueId.get();
         }
     } // UniqueThreadIdGenerator
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is probably very simple, but my attempts (guided by Intellisense and MSDN) have
This is probably a very simple question. I am new to Rails and have
This probably has a simple answer, but I must not have had enough coffee
This is probably a really simple jQuery question, but I couldn't answer it after
I'm afraid this is a very generic question, but unfortunately my question is exactly
This is probably a very basic question, but I'm really new to generics in
This is probably a very simple one to be answered... I have a piece
This is probably a very simple fix but I've been unable to find an
This probably sounds really stupid but I have noo idea how to implement jquery's
Okay, so this probably sounds terribly nefarious, but I need such capabilities for my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.