Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 678735
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:10:57+00:00 2026-05-14T01:10:57+00:00

This is what I’m trying to do: def call_block(in_class = String, &block) instance =

  • 0

This is what I’m trying to do:

def call_block(in_class = "String", &block)
    instance = eval("#{in_class}.new")
    puts "instance class: #{instance.class}"
    instance.instance_eval{ block.call }
end


# --- TEST EXAMPLE ---
# This outputs "class: String" every time
"sdlkfj".instance_eval {  puts "class: #{self.class}" }

# This will only output "class: Object" every time
# I'm trying to get this to output "class: String" though
call_block("String") { puts "class: #{self.class}" }

On the line where it says “instance.instance_eval{ block.call }”, I’m trying to find another way to make the new instance variable run instance eval on the block. The only way I can think of to get it to do that is to pass instance_eval the original block, not as a variable or anything, but as a real block like in the test example.

Any tips?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:10:57+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:10 am

    Yes. You can pass the block to the other method by prepending the block variable with an ampersand like so:

    def foo &blk
      # now, blk is a variable bound to a block object
      bar &blk
    end
    

    The reason your are getting “class: Object” is that Ruby uses lexical scoping. This means that self in puts "class: #{self.class}" refers to main, the default context.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 366k
  • Answers 366k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There are many ways to scale an image. The easiest… May 14, 2026 at 4:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer AFAIK the naming conventions are rather straightforward. If there's a… May 14, 2026 at 4:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You said you tried to close() the stream but got… May 14, 2026 at 4:43 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.