Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8001281
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T16:03:15+00:00 2026-06-04T16:03:15+00:00

This should be pretty simple, yet it’s blowing up. Any ideas? d = BigDecimal.new(2.0)

  • 0

This should be pretty simple, yet it’s blowing up. Any ideas?

d = BigDecimal.new("2.0")
YAML::load({:a => d}.to_yaml)
TypeError: BigDecimal can't be coerced into BigDecimal
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/inspector.rb:86:in `inspect'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/inspector.rb:86:in `inspect'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/inspector.rb:86:in `block in <module:IRB>'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/inspector.rb:30:in `call'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/inspector.rb:30:in `inspect_value'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/context.rb:260:in `inspect_last_value'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:311:in `output_value'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:160:in `block (2 levels) in eval_input'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:273:in `signal_status'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:156:in `block in eval_input'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:243:in `block (2 levels) in each_top_level_statement'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in `loop'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in `block in each_top_level_statement'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:228:in `catch'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:228:in `each_top_level_statement'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:155:in `eval_input'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:70:in `block in start'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:69:in `catch'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:69:in `start'
from /Users/benjohnson/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/bin/irb:16:in `<main>'Maybe IRB bug!
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T16:03:16+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 4:03 pm

    This is a bug that has been reported and fixed.

    The best solution would be upgrade to the latest Ruby (the fix is in patch level 194 onwards).

    If you can’t upgrade your Ruby version, you can get the fix by installing the Psych gem. If you do this you’ll need to add gem 'psych' before you require 'yaml' (or add it to your Gemfile if you’re using Bundler) to load the code from the gem rather than from the standard library..

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This should be pretty simple, but I am new at LINQ. I have a
This should probably be pretty simple but my Google-Fu is as yet unable to
This feels like it should be pretty simple, but not much seems to be
this should be pretty simple but I don't get it. How can I draw
This should be pretty simple but it's not working. I have a file underneath
This should be pretty simple but for some reason I can't get this value
I assume this should be pretty simple, but could not get it :(. In
Hey, this should be pretty simple, but it's causing me a lot of grief!
This should be pretty simple, but I can't seem to get it. I have
This question should be pretty simple. I have a php file in a directory

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.