Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 850455
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T07:16:06+00:00 2026-05-15T07:16:06+00:00

To let JavaScript able to run in server-side? If it’s justified, what’s the advantage?

  • 0

To let JavaScript able to run in server-side?

If it’s justified, what’s the advantage? and any good application for such use?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T07:16:07+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:16 am

    There are lots of possible reasons. Here’s a blog post by Steve Yegge (of Google) explaining why he was looking into using Mozilla Rhino (which later because javax.script).

    According to the Rhino site:

    It is typically embedded into Java
    applications to provide scripting to
    end users.

    So I guess that’s one good reason. Other things I’ve read include doing it because you have some complex language that you want to run on either the browser or the server, and you don’t want to write it twice (as here).

    Generally speaking, that’s a lot of complexity, and generally speaking, complexity is bad.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need JavaScript working almost perfectly in my application that should be able to
i just want to be able to call a javascritp subroutine on the client,
I am writing a Facebook application that is a simple board game which I
Before the "beating a dead horse" comments begin, let me clarify what I am
I'm working on a web application (with ASP.NET 2.0 (C#) and jQuery) In my
I am building a library to automatically create forms for Objects in the project
I've copied some text nodes from the page (i.e., live DOM) and have stored
While I haven't actually used it, an email analytics web app called Litmus claims
When using setTimeout , you have to put the code you want to execute

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.