Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 176019
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:48:08+00:00 2026-05-11T13:48:08+00:00

Until recently, we were happily using registration-free COM for our native and .NET COM

  • 0

Until recently, we were happily using registration-free COM for our native and .NET COM components. However, we ran into a weird issue where our application started crashing randomly on windows XP SP3 (but not on vista) after we only changed the version number of a .NET assembly to move from release candidate to release. (Don’t you just hate Murphy’s law?)

After many a lost man-day and teeth grinding, we discovered that the issue was a known bug in sxs.dll which causes heap corruption when retrieving information about a .NET class. There is a hot-fix which makes the issue disappear but hot-fixes are not intended to be redistributed.

We’re kinda stumped that there is such a horrible bug in the registration-free COM implementation. Is anyone out there successfully using registration-free COM for .NET components? How did you work around this issue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:48:08+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:48 pm

    This issue is related to how SxS calculates the size of the class information. The version number of the assembly is part of this information.

    Since it was working with the release candidate version number, perhaps the workaround for you is to make the version number of the release the same length as the RC release.

    If this doesn’t work for you, there is an established process for requesting redistribution rights for hotfixes. I would engage Microsoft customer support to pursue this route.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I came across this recently, up until now I have been happily overriding the
Up until recently, I've been storing multiple values into different hashes with the same
I had never tried Continuum as a build server until recently when a project
So, I have willfully kept myself a Java n00b until recently, and my first
Up until now I have been using std::string in my C++ applications for embedded
Until Office 2007, Excel has a maximum of 65,000 rows. Office 2007 bumped that
I didn't upgrade to Vista until May or so and one of the things
The code below continues many lines until it ends with a expected /veotherwise /vechoose.
Certain methods in Java will block until they can do something, like ServerSocket.accept() and
I'm a ClearCase newbie and up until now have been used to SVN. Therefore,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.