Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 176019
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:48:08+00:00 2026-05-11T13:48:08+00:00

Until recently, we were happily using registration-free COM for our native and .NET COM

  • 0

Until recently, we were happily using registration-free COM for our native and .NET COM components. However, we ran into a weird issue where our application started crashing randomly on windows XP SP3 (but not on vista) after we only changed the version number of a .NET assembly to move from release candidate to release. (Don’t you just hate Murphy’s law?)

After many a lost man-day and teeth grinding, we discovered that the issue was a known bug in sxs.dll which causes heap corruption when retrieving information about a .NET class. There is a hot-fix which makes the issue disappear but hot-fixes are not intended to be redistributed.

We’re kinda stumped that there is such a horrible bug in the registration-free COM implementation. Is anyone out there successfully using registration-free COM for .NET components? How did you work around this issue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:48:08+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:48 pm

    This issue is related to how SxS calculates the size of the class information. The version number of the assembly is part of this information.

    Since it was working with the release candidate version number, perhaps the workaround for you is to make the version number of the release the same length as the RC release.

    If this doesn’t work for you, there is an established process for requesting redistribution rights for hotfixes. I would engage Microsoft customer support to pursue this route.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Until recently we were using Inno Setup for our installations, something I would like
In our company, just until recently, we were not using namespaces because some compilers
Until recently I have been using cairngorm as a framework for flex. However, in
Until recently, I posted Python code (whitespace matters) to blogspot.com using something like this:
I came across this recently, up until now I have been happily overriding the
Until recently, I believed that the .NET runtime only increases the reference count of
Up until recently, I've been storing multiple values into different hashes with the same
I had until recently been under the impression that the CDbl(x) operation in VB.NET
We have an application that performs auto-updates. Until recently, we haven't run into any
Up until recently I had a working service using NHibernate 2.0. I have upgraded

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.