Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3871456
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T21:49:32+00:00 2026-05-19T21:49:32+00:00

UPDATE I wrongly checked the edgerails guide instead of the currently correct Rails 3

  • 0

UPDATE

I wrongly checked the edgerails guide instead of the currently correct Rails 3 guide (which has no mention of after_initialize). Not sure why the edgerails guide is “incorrect” though – I thought edgerails guide was supposed to be the latest up-to-date guide?

I’m leaving this question as-is just in case someone comes looking for the same “problem”.

Macro-style call to after_initialize is the way to go.



Should after_initialize be used as method or macro-style call ?

This works, but gives a deprecation warning:

def after_initialize
  logger.info "Called after_initialize"
end

DEPRECATION WARNING: Base#after_initialize has been deprecated,
please use Base.after_initialize :method instead.

This works, and there is no warning:

after_initialize :do_this_after_initialize
def do_this_after_initialize
  logger.info "Called after_initialize"
end

But the Active Record Validations and Callbacks Guide in 10.4 after_initialize and after_find says:

…If you try to register
after_initialize or after_find using
macro-style class methods, they will
just be ignored. This behaviour is
due to performance reasons, since
after_initialize and after_find will
both be called for each record found
in the database, significantly slowing
down the queries…

So that means that the macro-style usage is inefficient versus the method-style way?

(I guess the guide is wrong, ‘cos code is king :D)


Another Update


A commit here from January 28, 2011, suggests that the correct way is still to use the macro-style call, not a def after_initialize.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T21:49:33+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 9:49 pm

    The call backs should be used as macro style in your model: http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Callbacks.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I wrongly named a column hased_password instead of hashed_password . How do I update
Update : Looks like the query does not throw any timeout. The connection is
Update: the much better answer has little to do with refactoring, but has to
Update: Solved, with code I got it working, see my answer below for the
Update: Check out this follow-up question: Gem Update on Windows - is it broken?
Update: giving a much more thorough example. The first two solutions offered were right
UPDATE: Focus your answers on hardware solutions please. What hardware/tools/add-in are you using to
Update: Now that it's 2016 I'd use PowerShell for this unless there's a really
UPDATE - A comprehensive comparison, updated as of February 2015, can be found here:
UPDATE: Thanks to everyone for the responses. I didn't realize document.write() was deprecated. Add

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.