Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6385295
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T02:52:54+00:00 2026-05-25T02:52:54+00:00

UPDATE (simplified problem, removed C# from the issue) How can I write an UPSERT

  • 0

UPDATE(simplified problem, removed C# from the issue)

How can I write an UPSERT that can recognize when two rows are the same in the following case…

SSMS

See how there’s a \b [backspace] encoded there (the weird little character)? SQL sees these as the same. While my UPSERT sees this as new data and attempts an INSERT where there should be an UPDATE.


//UPSERT
    INSERT INTO [table]
    SELECT [col1] = @col1, [col2] = @col2, [col3] = @col3, [col4] = @col4
    FROM [table]
    WHERE NOT EXISTS
       -- race condition risk here?
       ( SELECT 1 FROM [table] 
       WHERE 
            [col1] = @col1 
        AND [col2] = @col2
        AND [col3] = @col3)

    UPDATE [table]
        SET [col4] = @col4
        WHERE 
        [col1] = @col1 
        AND [col2] = @col2
        AND [col3] = @col3
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T02:52:54+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:52 am

    After hours of tinkering it turns out I’ve been on a wild goose chase. The problem is very simple. I pulled my UPSERT from a popular SO post. The code is no good. The select will sometimes return > 1 rows on INSERT. Thereby attempting to insert a row, then insert the same row again.

    The fix is to remove FROM

        //UPSERT
        INSERT INTO [table]
        SELECT [col1] = @col1, [col2] = @col2, [col3] = @col3, [col4] = @col4
        --FROM [table] (Dont use FROM..not a race condition, just a bad SELECT)
        WHERE NOT EXISTS
           ( SELECT 1 FROM [table] 
           WHERE 
                [col1] = @col1 
            AND [col2] = @col2
            AND [col3] = @col3)
    
        UPDATE [table]
            SET [col4] = @col4
            WHERE 
            [col1] = @col1 
            AND [col2] = @col2
            AND [col3] = @col3
    

    Problem is gone.

    Thanks to all of you.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

UPDATE: Seems that railo doesn't have this issue at all. UPDATE: I'm voting to
The following code is the simplified version of my problem: public partial class Form1
I've run into a strange problem. The following simplified code reproduces the problem in
I'm struggling to convert the following (simplified) HQL to QueryOver: select subscription from Subscription
Update: giving a much more thorough example. The first two solutions offered were right
Update: Now that it's 2016 I'd use PowerShell for this unless there's a really
UPDATE - A comprehensive comparison, updated as of February 2015, can be found here:
UPDATE: Thanks to everyone for the responses. I didn't realize document.write() was deprecated. Add
I need to create a filter that is triggered on any save/update action in
I have a Grid that looks something like the simplified example showed below. There

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.