Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4578978
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T20:34:39+00:00 2026-05-21T20:34:39+00:00

Using stun I will get my external ip/port and NAT type. On my middle

  • 0
  1. Using stun I will get my external ip/port and NAT type.
  2. On my middle server (public ip), I will register peers external ip/ports (Now server knows peer 1’s and 2’s external ip/port).
  3. Exchange the ip/port (peer 1 will get to know the peer 2’s ip/port).
  4. Simultaneously make connect() call from both the peers.

Is it the right flow?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T20:34:40+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:34 pm

    Your algorithm is correct for UDP. Take a look at these posts for more information:

    • TCP Hole Punch (NAT Traversal) Library or something?
    • UDP Hole Punching
    • TCP Hole Punching
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Using Rails 3.2.0 with haml and sass: I Would like to link an external
Using the HTML5 File API I can get the Binary String representation of a
Using NSDateComponents I know how to get the day component, but this gives me
Using emacs on Ubuntu 11.10. I want to connect to a SQL Server database
Using Sql Server 2005 Profiler, what events, columns, and filters do you trace to
using file_get_contents , I open an Internet URL and get the contents of this
Using the current request I can get the URL hostname with: HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.Host But -
Using SQL Server 2005 Leave Table ID StartDate EndDate 001 02/03/2010 02/03/2010 002 02/03/2010
Using the C# Facebook SDK 5.0.3 everything works fine whit the client.Get(/me). But when
using SQL Server 2005 standard edition with SP2 I need to design a table

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.