Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4578978
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T20:34:39+00:00 2026-05-21T20:34:39+00:00

Using stun I will get my external ip/port and NAT type. On my middle

  • 0
  1. Using stun I will get my external ip/port and NAT type.
  2. On my middle server (public ip), I will register peers external ip/ports (Now server knows peer 1’s and 2’s external ip/port).
  3. Exchange the ip/port (peer 1 will get to know the peer 2’s ip/port).
  4. Simultaneously make connect() call from both the peers.

Is it the right flow?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T20:34:40+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:34 pm

    Your algorithm is correct for UDP. Take a look at these posts for more information:

    • TCP Hole Punch (NAT Traversal) Library or something?
    • UDP Hole Punching
    • TCP Hole Punching
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

using SQL server 2005+ for over a year now, I've been running a query
Using a populated Table Type as the source for a TSQL-Merge. I want to
Using SQL Server 2008 R2 we are looking for a way to select the
Using the Redis info command, I am able to get all the stats of
Using Location.getBearing(); I seem to get randomly changing bearings. Aka, I can turn the
Using Microsoft SQL Server 2005, is there any way to see when a table
Using System.Diagnostics.EventLog .NET type one can programmatically create logs into the Event Viewer application.
using Telerik.WinControls.Data; using Telerik.WinControls.UI.Export; namespace Directory { public partial class radForm : Form {
Using Tsql, how can I find out when MS SQL server was installed?
Using jQuery, how do I get the value from a textbox and then load

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.