Question

void f(char* p)
{}

int main()
{
    f("Hello"); // OK

    auto p = "Hello";

    f(p); // error C2664: 'void f(char *)' : cannot convert parameter 1 
          // from 'const char *' to 'char *'
} 

The code was compiled with VC++ Nov 2012 CTP.

§2.14.15 String Literals, Section 7

A narrow string literal has type “array of n const char”, where n is
the size of the string as defined below, and has static storage
duration.

Why is f("Hello") OK?

Answer 1

This behaviour differs between C and C++, at least in theory.

In C: a string literal decays to a non-const pointer. However, that doesn’t make it a good idea; attempting to modify the string through that pointer leads to undefined behaviour.

In C++: it’s never ok (AFAIK).^* However, some compilers may still let you get away with it. GCC, for example, has the -Wwrite-strings flag, which is enabled by default (at least in 4.5.1 onwards).

---

_{* In C++11, at least. (I don’t have older specs to hand.)}