Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8354163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T09:28:22+00:00 2026-06-09T09:28:22+00:00

We can make class Foo <T> , why can’t I call new T() ?

  • 0

We can make class Foo <T>, why can’t I call new T()?
I tried to understand, I know that T is a type variable, but didn’t get that answer… which is asked by friend, am also eager to know the answer… please, thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T09:28:23+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 9:28 am

    Because you cannot know if T is even instantiable, it could have a private constructor.

    Imagine:

    class Foo<T> {
    
        public Foo() {
            new T();
        }
    }
    
    class Bar {
        private Bar() {}
    }
    
    class FooBar {
        public FooBar() {
           Foo<Bar> foo = new Foo<>();
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know from Algebra class that with ABC and 123 we can make 216
Given an instantiated JavaScript object/class can I make an Ajax call from that class
In Scala, I can make a caseclass, case class Foo(x:Int) , and then put
I'm trying to make a class Bar that extends a class Foo . The
I have a class that I'm trying to make extend DelayedInit : class Foo
i'm new to django, i'm trying to make a class-based views where i can
Can we make a class copy constructor virtual in C++? How to use?
How can I make my class library STA for use with CreateObject in VBScript?
How can I specify the position of a JOptionPane. Can anyone make a class
To make a class immutable what I can do is: 1)Make class final 2)do

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.