Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7739393
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T08:30:41+00:00 2026-06-01T08:30:41+00:00

We can prove that set of all one argument functions cannot be countable using

  • 0

We can prove that set of all one argument functions cannot be countable using the cantor’s diagonal.
for example

     1    2    3    4    5    6    7 ......

f1   10   12   23   1    3    12   3 ......    
f2   15    6    7   8    9    11   4 ...... 
f3   14    2    4   3    3     4   5 ...... 
f4   12    2    3   5    1    20   56 .....   
.
.
.

for all functions f1 to fn we can pass all the arguments and 1 to n for some n. then by taking the diagonal values and add 1 to diagonal values and we can prove that we can’t count all the one argument functions.(since change the diagonal values will produce a row unique which haven’t listed)

Wonder is there a particular method to count two argument functions also??..

Thanks..

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T08:30:42+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 8:30 am

    I think I’ve found an answer. I’m writing the answer in case anyone is interested.

    we can prove than all the pairs of positive integers can be countable. see below

    (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) (1,4) (1,5) (1,6).....
    (2,1) (2,2) (2,3) (2,4) (2,5) (2,6).....
    (3,1) (3,2) (3,3) (3,4) (3,5) (3,6).....
    (4,1) (4,2) (4,3) (4,4) (4,5) (4,6).....
     .
     .
     .
    

    so from the cantor’s zig zag we can prove that they can be countable.. see page 8 on this book http://www.scribd.com/doc/51068193/3/Enumerable-Sets

    (1,1) (1,2) (2,1) (1,3) (2,2) (3,1) ....
    

    so we can write our problem as below.

        (1,1)   (1,2)   (2,1)   (1,3)   (2,2)   (3,1)
    
    f1   10      12       23       1      3       12    ......    
    f2   15       6        7       8      9       11    ...... 
    f3   14       2        4       3      3        4    ...... 
    f4   12       2        3       5      1       20    ......   
    .
    .
    .
    

    Now by the knowledge of cantor’s diagonal.. we can argue that all the two argument functions can’t be countable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How can I quickly prove that the following class is not thread-safe (as it
I apologize for asking such a generalized question, but it's something that can prove
I'm trying to prove that changing document.domain can be used only for cross scripting
I've searched all over and I can't figure this one out. I am working
Can someone explain mathematical induction to prove a recursive method? I am a freshmen
Can somebody point me to a resource that explains how to go about having
Can a LINQ enabled app run on a machine that only has the .NET
I'm trying to build a site that runs without refreshes, using Jquery and PHP
I want to start by saying that I am a big fan of using
I'm trying to simply prove here that this simple function isn't good enough to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.