We found out that run length is much better than huffman coding (JAVA) considering compression ratio. Is it true for all cases?
We found out that run length is much better than huffman coding (JAVA) considering
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
We found out that run length is much better than huffman coding (JAVA) considering compression ratio. Is it true for all cases?
Of course not. Consider
ABABABAB, it will compress better with huffman than run-length encoding.Run length will only work for data that have repeated values; that’s not guaranteed in images.