Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 87497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:24:43+00:00 2026-05-10T22:24:43+00:00

We have a .NET object that does a lot of reading/writing with the database.

  • 0

We have a .NET object that does a lot of reading/writing with the database. Throughout the life cycle of this object (or the asp page that uses it), it may hit the database with a query/update anywhere from 1 to 10 times.

Instead of opening and closing a database connection every time the object needs to hit the database, it simply opens a connection to the database during instantiation and then closes the connection during the object’s termination event. Is that a bad practice?

The assumption was that since the object hits the database every time it’s instantiated (and usually multiple times), it would be better to just open a connection at the beginning of the object’s life and then close it at the end.

The other alternative is to open and close the database connection before and after each query/operation.

What’s the best practice here in order to maximize performance?

****update**** Thanks for the tips guys. Can anyone speak more to the method of opening/closing a connection inside an object’s instantiation/termination events and the repercussions of doing so?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:24:44+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:24 pm

    Open an close the connection as needed. ADO.NET has built in connection pooling that works. You will not notice any performance issues unless you are doing this in a loop with thousands of open/closes.

    edit See Should I persist a sqlconnection in my data access layer? for more information as to the pitfalls of connection persistence.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 75k
  • Answers 75k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer You could use the Microsoft.Build.Framework.Required attribute. This would require a… May 11, 2026 at 2:52 pm
  • added an answer Almost certainly the problem is environmental - not source related.… May 11, 2026 at 2:52 pm
  • added an answer Call a function instead. <select id='value' onchange='sendForm()'> ...script block... function… May 11, 2026 at 2:52 pm

Related Questions

We have a WinForms app, written in VB.NET (CLR 2.0), that does a lot
The Question My question is: Does C# nativly support late-binding IDispatch? Pretend i'm trying
I always felt that expecting exceptions to be thrown on a regular basis and
Looking for some direction here as I'm running into some migration problems. We have

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.