Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 87497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:24:43+00:00 2026-05-10T22:24:43+00:00

We have a .NET object that does a lot of reading/writing with the database.

  • 0

We have a .NET object that does a lot of reading/writing with the database. Throughout the life cycle of this object (or the asp page that uses it), it may hit the database with a query/update anywhere from 1 to 10 times.

Instead of opening and closing a database connection every time the object needs to hit the database, it simply opens a connection to the database during instantiation and then closes the connection during the object’s termination event. Is that a bad practice?

The assumption was that since the object hits the database every time it’s instantiated (and usually multiple times), it would be better to just open a connection at the beginning of the object’s life and then close it at the end.

The other alternative is to open and close the database connection before and after each query/operation.

What’s the best practice here in order to maximize performance?

****update**** Thanks for the tips guys. Can anyone speak more to the method of opening/closing a connection inside an object’s instantiation/termination events and the repercussions of doing so?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:24:44+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:24 pm

    Open an close the connection as needed. ADO.NET has built in connection pooling that works. You will not notice any performance issues unless you are doing this in a loop with thousands of open/closes.

    edit See Should I persist a sqlconnection in my data access layer? for more information as to the pitfalls of connection persistence.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Disclaimer: I have read the ASP.net page life cycle , and I've also read
I have an ASP.NET WebService that returns an object of List public class Students
i have an ASP.NET web service that returning a custom entity object (Staff): [WebMethod]
I have a few .Net projects that would benefit from using a document/object database
I have an ASP.NET / C# web application that is using a lot of
We have a WinForms app, written in VB.NET (CLR 2.0), that does a lot
An interesting question arose today. Let's say I have a .NET object that implements
I have a Javascript object that basically represents a Row in an .NET GridView.
I have a COM object that I'm trying to use from C++ (not .NET),
If I have an IEnumerable object in my .net code that contains a single

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.