Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6820275
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T21:24:19+00:00 2026-05-26T21:24:19+00:00

What does this statement mean? //allocated memory for Device info (*PppsCoreStructure)->psDeviceDetails=(sDeviceDetails **)calloc(CORE_DEVICEINFO_SIZE, sizeof(sDeviceDetails*)); I

  • 0

What does this statement mean?

//allocated memory for Device info

(*PppsCoreStructure)->psDeviceDetails=(sDeviceDetails **)calloc(CORE_DEVICEINFO_SIZE, sizeof(sDeviceDetails*));

I know that ‘(*PppsCoreStructure)->psDeviceDetails’ is a pointer to pointer. But I am not being able to imagine how calloc can return pointer to pointer? I’m a beginner please help

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T21:24:20+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 9:24 pm
    • (*PppsCoreStructure)->psDeviceDetails is declared with type sDeviceDetails **
    • The return value of calloc() is of type void*
    • (sDeviceDetails **)calloc(...) casts the return value of calloc to be of type sDeviceDetails **

    In the C++ language this type cast is essential, although in C++ one would normally not be using calloc and would probably be using C++ casts.

    In the C language the type cast is not needed because a void* pointer is assignment compatible with all other pointer types.


    In a comment you state

    But I want know how sDeviceDetails* is different from sDeviceDetails**

    and I suspect that this is in fact your real question.

    The answer is simple enough: T* is a pointer-to-T and T** is a pointer-to-pointer-to-T.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

All are from this post . What does these statement mean: error(nargchk(5, 6, nargin));
As I am a MySQL newbie. What does PARTITION mean in this MySQL statement?
What does this statement mean? A default copy constructor or default copy assignment copies
What does this mean within my like statement? LIKE '%[ .,!?]' + keyword +
What does this Statement Mean... A cycle was detected in the build path of
What does this statement mean? im3 = appendimages(im1,zeros(size(im1,1),gap)); appendimages is the function for concatenation
What does this statement mean??? [M N ~] = size(imge); I don't understand the
What does the following statement mean? Local and dynamically allocated variables have addresses that
Does anyone have any idea what is wrong with this create statement for mysql?
Does this code cause a memory leak: int main(){ int * a = new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.