Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6330793
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T17:56:07+00:00 2026-05-24T17:56:07+00:00

What is a good practice to implement MMVM with WCF Services? The View model

  • 0

What is a good practice to implement MMVM with WCF Services? The View model will be communicating with the service. So lets say in a view I have 3-4 data display modules. All this information for the modules is coming from different WCF Service calls.
If I do this synchronously, I have a feeling that the data in the view model will take time to load.

I want to do the calls for all these service methods asynchronously with out waiting for the first call to come back. What is good way of doing this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T17:56:08+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:56 pm

    I think the best way is to call the Service Asynchronously and then assign value on Complete method, like:

     class TestViewModel : ViewModelBase
    {
        private ObservableCollection<string> data;
    
        public ObservableCollection<string> Data
        {
            get { return data; }
            set
            {
                if (value == data) return;
                data = value;
                RaisePropertyChanged("Data");
            }
        }
    
        public TestViewModel()
        {
            GetDataClient proxy = new GetDataClient();
    
            System.EventHandler<GetDataCompletedEventArgs> Client_GetDataCompleted = null;
            Client_GetDataCompleted = (s, e) =>
            {
                if (e.Error == null && e.Result != null)
                {
                    Data = new ObservableCollection<SelectionItem<string>>(e.Result));                    
                }
    
                proxy.GetDataCompleted -= Client_GetDataCompleted;
            };
    
            proxy.GetDataCompleted += Client_GetDataCompleted;            
            proxy.GetDataAsync();            
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to implement a very secured Web Service using WCF. I have read
Is it good practice to delegate data validation entirely to the database engine constraints?
Is it good practice to have a class constructor that uses default parameters, or
Is it good practice to have a unit test that specifies how long a
Is it good practice to have more than one try{} catch{} statement per method?
what is good practice for generating verbose output? currently, i have a function bool
What good-practice-indicating idioms do you look for in a sequence of method invocations, as
Is it good practice to let abstract classes define instance variables? public abstract class
It is good practice to use the main method to test a java/.net class?
Is there any good practice related to dynamic_cast error handling (except not using it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.