Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6144937
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T18:43:22+00:00 2026-05-23T18:43:22+00:00

What is more efficient?: var text=ABCdef; var lowerVersion=text.toLowerCase(); if (lowerVersion==’abcdef’ || lowerVersion==’asdfgh’ || lowerVersion==’zxcvbn’){…

  • 0

What is more efficient?:

var text="ABCdef";
var lowerVersion=text.toLowerCase();
if (lowerVersion=='abcdef' || lowerVersion=='asdfgh' || lowerVersion=='zxcvbn'){...

or

var text="ABCdef";
if (text.toLowerCase()=='abcdef' || text.toLowerCase()=='asdfgh' || text.toLowerCase()=='zxcvbn'){...

i.e. is variable creation more expensive than running toLowerCase() several times?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T18:43:22+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 6:43 pm

    This is JavaScript. The answer is going to be: It depends. It depends on what engine you’re using, on your data, on the other things in the context, on whether the first or last match matches, on alternate Tuesdays…

    But creating variables in JavaScript is very fast. In contrast, the repeated calls version asks the interpreter to make multiple function calls, and function calls (while fast by any real measure) are slow compared to most other operations. The only way that’s going to be as fast is if the interpreter can figure out that it can cache the result of the call, which is tricky.

    Taking @Felix’s performance test and making it pessimistic (e.g., worst case and none of them match) suggests that even Chrome can’t optimize it enough to make the repeated function calls not come out worse. I didn’t do any comprehensive tests, but Chrome, Firefox, and Opera all came out about 60% slower.

    You have an alternative, of course:

    var text="ABCdef";
    switch (text.toLowerCase()) {
      case 'abcdef':
        // ...
        break;
      case 'asdfgh'
        // ...
        break;
      case 'zxcvbn'
        // ...
        break;
    }
    

    All of this is premature optimisation, though, which is bad enough generally but particularly bad with JavaScript and the varying environments in which it runs complicating things.

    The better question is: What’s clearer and more maintainable?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is for (var i=0, cols=columns.length; i<cols; i++) { ... } more efficient than for
Is there a more efficient way to clamp real numbers than using if statements
Is there are more efficient way than the following for selecting the third parent?
The DataReader is more efficient than a DataTable if you only need to show
I've been wondering whether using prototypes in JavaScript should be more memory efficient than
Which is more efficient for the compiler and the best practice for checking whether
Is there a more efficient way to convert an HTMLCollection to an Array, other
Is it more efficient for a class to access member variables or local variables?
Which is more efficient? SELECT theField FROM theTable GROUP BY theField or SELECT DISTINCT
What is more efficient -- having a IDbTransaction in the .net code or handling

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.