Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8144015
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T13:15:42+00:00 2026-06-06T13:15:42+00:00

What is more pythonic / more effective / nicer: fp.write(some_long_string) fp.write(‘\n’) or fp.write(some_long_string +

  • 0

What is “more pythonic” / more effective / nicer:

fp.write(some_long_string)
fp.write('\n')

or

fp.write(some_long_string + '\n')

or

fp.writelines([some_long_string])
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T13:15:43+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 1:15 pm

    If you can get away without a function call:

    print >>fp, some_long_string
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm wondering which is the more 'Pythonic' / better way to write methods which
Is there a more pythonic way to write __getitem__ than the following? The issue
there is more elegant (pythonic + effective) way to find word on given position?
Okay I'm trying to go for a more pythonic method of doing things. How
What is more pythonic ? import os import sys import getopt ... or import
Is there a more Pythonic way of doing this?: if self.name2info[name]['prereqs'] is None: self.name2info[name]['prereqs']
I'm looking for a better/more Pythonic solution for the following snippet count = sum(1
Possible Duplicate: Python program to find fibonacci series. More Pythonic way. Hey, i was
Is there a shorter (perhaps more pythonic) way of opening a text file and
How would you make the give code more Pythonic? I want to get Paths

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.