Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6347177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T21:09:46+00:00 2026-05-24T21:09:46+00:00

What is the best way to perform bulk inserts into an MS Access database

  • 0

What is the best way to perform bulk inserts into an MS Access database from .NET? Using ADO.NET, it is taking way over an hour to write out a large dataset.

Note that my original post, before I “refactored” it, had both the question and answer in the question part. I took Igor Turman’s suggestion and re-wrote it in two parts – the question above and followed by my answer.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T21:09:49+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:09 pm

    I found that using DAO in a specific manner is roughly 30 times faster than using ADO.NET. I am sharing the code and results in this answer. As background, in the below, the test is to write out 100 000 records of a table with 20 columns.

    A summary of the technique and times – from best to worse:

    1. 02.8 seconds: Use DAO, use DAO.Field‘s to refer to the table columns
    2. 02.8 seconds: Write out to a text file, use Automation to import the text into Access
    3. 11.0 seconds: Use DAO, use the column index to refer to the table columns.
    4. 17.0 seconds: Use DAO, refer to the column by name
    5. 79.0 seconds: Use ADO.NET, generate INSERT statements for each row
    6. 86.0 seconds: Use ADO.NET, use DataTable to an DataAdapter for “batch” insert

    As background, occasionally I need to perform analysis of reasonably large amounts of data, and I find that Access is the best platform. The analysis involves many queries, and often a lot of VBA code.

    For various reasons, I wanted to use C# instead of VBA. The typical way is to use OleDB to connect to Access. I used an OleDbDataReader to grab millions of records, and it worked quite well. But when outputting results to a table, it took a long, long time. Over an hour.

    First, let’s discuss the two typical ways to write records to Access from C#. Both ways involve OleDB and ADO.NET. The first is to generate INSERT statements one at time, and execute them, taking 79 seconds for the 100 000 records. The code is:

    public static double TestADONET_Insert_TransferToAccess()
    {
      StringBuilder names = new StringBuilder();
      for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++)
      {
        string fieldName = "Field" + (k + 1).ToString();
        if (k > 0)
        {
          names.Append(",");
        }
        names.Append(fieldName);
      }
    
      DateTime start = DateTime.Now;
      using (OleDbConnection conn = new OleDbConnection(Properties.Settings.Default.AccessDB))
      {
        conn.Open();
        OleDbCommand cmd = new OleDbCommand();
        cmd.Connection = conn;
    
        cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM TEMP";
        int numRowsDeleted = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
        Console.WriteLine("Deleted {0} rows from TEMP", numRowsDeleted);
    
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
        {
          StringBuilder insertSQL = new StringBuilder("INSERT INTO TEMP (")
            .Append(names)
            .Append(") VALUES (");
    
          for (int k = 0; k < 19; k++)
          {
            insertSQL.Append(i + k).Append(",");
          }
          insertSQL.Append(i + 19).Append(")");
          cmd.CommandText = insertSQL.ToString();
          cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
        }
        cmd.Dispose();
      }
      double elapsedTimeInSeconds = DateTime.Now.Subtract(start).TotalSeconds;
      Console.WriteLine("Append took {0} seconds", elapsedTimeInSeconds);
      return elapsedTimeInSeconds;
    }
    

    Note that I found no method in Access that allows a bulk insert.

    I had then thought that maybe using a data table with a data adapter would be prove useful. Especially since I thought that I could do batch inserts using the UpdateBatchSize property of a data adapter. However, apparently only SQL Server and Oracle support that, and Access does not. And it took the longest time of 86 seconds. The code I used was:

    public static double TestADONET_DataTable_TransferToAccess()
    {
      StringBuilder names = new StringBuilder();
      StringBuilder values = new StringBuilder();
      DataTable dt = new DataTable("TEMP");
      for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++)
      {
        string fieldName = "Field" + (k + 1).ToString();
        dt.Columns.Add(fieldName, typeof(int));
        if (k > 0)
        {
          names.Append(",");
          values.Append(",");
        }
        names.Append(fieldName);
        values.Append("@" + fieldName);
      }
    
      DateTime start = DateTime.Now;
      OleDbConnection conn = new OleDbConnection(Properties.Settings.Default.AccessDB);
      conn.Open();
      OleDbCommand cmd = new OleDbCommand();
      cmd.Connection = conn;
    
      cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM TEMP";
      int numRowsDeleted = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
      Console.WriteLine("Deleted {0} rows from TEMP", numRowsDeleted);
    
      OleDbDataAdapter da = new OleDbDataAdapter("SELECT * FROM TEMP", conn);
    
      da.InsertCommand = new OleDbCommand("INSERT INTO TEMP (" + names.ToString() + ") VALUES (" + values.ToString() + ")");
      for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++)
      {
        string fieldName = "Field" + (k + 1).ToString();
        da.InsertCommand.Parameters.Add("@" + fieldName, OleDbType.Integer, 4, fieldName);
      }
      da.InsertCommand.UpdatedRowSource = UpdateRowSource.None;
      da.InsertCommand.Connection = conn;
      //da.UpdateBatchSize = 0;
    
      for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
      {
        DataRow dr = dt.NewRow();
        for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++)
        {
          dr["Field" + (k + 1).ToString()] = i + k;
        }
        dt.Rows.Add(dr);
      }
      da.Update(dt);
      conn.Close();
    
      double elapsedTimeInSeconds = DateTime.Now.Subtract(start).TotalSeconds;
      Console.WriteLine("Append took {0} seconds", elapsedTimeInSeconds);
      return elapsedTimeInSeconds;
    }
    

    Then I tried non-standard ways. First, I wrote out to a text file, and then used Automation to import that in. This was fast – 2.8 seconds – and tied for first place. But I consider this fragile for a number of reasons: Outputing date fields is tricky. I had to format them specially (someDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm")), and then set up a special “import specification” that codes in this format. The import specification also had to have the “quote” delimiter set right. In the example below, with only integer fields, there was no need for an import specification.

    Text files are also fragile for “internationalization” where there is a use of comma’s for decimal separators, different date formats, possible the use of unicode.

    Notice that the first record contains the field names so that the column order isn’t dependent on the table, and that we used Automation to do the actual import of the text file.

    public static double TestTextTransferToAccess()
    {
      StringBuilder names = new StringBuilder();
      for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++)
      {
        string fieldName = "Field" + (k + 1).ToString();
        if (k > 0)
        {
          names.Append(",");
        }
        names.Append(fieldName);
      }
    
      DateTime start = DateTime.Now;
      StreamWriter sw = new StreamWriter(Properties.Settings.Default.TEMPPathLocation);
    
      sw.WriteLine(names);
      for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
      {
        for (int k = 0; k < 19; k++)
        {
          sw.Write(i + k);
          sw.Write(",");
        }
        sw.WriteLine(i + 19);
      }
      sw.Close();
    
      ACCESS.Application accApplication = new ACCESS.Application();
      string databaseName = Properties.Settings.Default.AccessDB
        .Split(new char[] { ';' }).First(s => s.StartsWith("Data Source=")).Substring(12);
    
      accApplication.OpenCurrentDatabase(databaseName, false, "");
      accApplication.DoCmd.RunSQL("DELETE FROM TEMP");
      accApplication.DoCmd.TransferText(TransferType: ACCESS.AcTextTransferType.acImportDelim,
      TableName: "TEMP",
      FileName: Properties.Settings.Default.TEMPPathLocation,
      HasFieldNames: true);
      accApplication.CloseCurrentDatabase();
      accApplication.Quit();
      accApplication = null;
    
      double elapsedTimeInSeconds = DateTime.Now.Subtract(start).TotalSeconds;
      Console.WriteLine("Append took {0} seconds", elapsedTimeInSeconds);
      return elapsedTimeInSeconds;
    }
    

    Finally, I tried DAO. Lots of sites out there give huge warnings about using DAO. However, it turns out that it is simply the best way to interact between Access and .NET, especially when you need to write out large number of records. Also, it gives access to all the properties of a table. I read somewhere that it’s easiest to program transactions using DAO instead of ADO.NET.

    Notice that there are several lines of code that are commented. They will be explained soon.

    public static double TestDAOTransferToAccess()
    {
    
      string databaseName = Properties.Settings.Default.AccessDB
        .Split(new char[] { ';' }).First(s => s.StartsWith("Data Source=")).Substring(12);
    
      DateTime start = DateTime.Now;
      DAO.DBEngine dbEngine = new DAO.DBEngine();
      DAO.Database db = dbEngine.OpenDatabase(databaseName);
    
      db.Execute("DELETE FROM TEMP");
    
      DAO.Recordset rs = db.OpenRecordset("TEMP");
    
      DAO.Field[] myFields = new DAO.Field[20];
      for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++) myFields[k] = rs.Fields["Field" + (k + 1).ToString()];
    
      //dbEngine.BeginTrans();
      for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
      {
        rs.AddNew();
        for (int k = 0; k < 20; k++)
        {
          //rs.Fields[k].Value = i + k;
          myFields[k].Value = i + k;
          //rs.Fields["Field" + (k + 1).ToString()].Value = i + k;
        }
        rs.Update();
        //if (0 == i % 5000)
        //{
          //dbEngine.CommitTrans();
          //dbEngine.BeginTrans();
        //}
      }
      //dbEngine.CommitTrans();
      rs.Close();
      db.Close();
    
      double elapsedTimeInSeconds = DateTime.Now.Subtract(start).TotalSeconds;
      Console.WriteLine("Append took {0} seconds", elapsedTimeInSeconds);
      return elapsedTimeInSeconds;
    }
    

    In this code, we created DAO.Field variables for each column (myFields[k]) and then used them. It took 2.8 seconds. Alternatively, one could directly access those fields as found in the commented line rs.Fields["Field" + (k + 1).ToString()].Value = i + k; which increased the time to 17 seconds. Wrapping the code in a transaction (see the commented lines) dropped that to 14 seconds. Using an integer index rs.Fields[k].Value = i + k; droppped that to 11 seconds. Using the DAO.Field (myFields[k]) and a transaction actually took longer, increasing the time to 3.1 seconds.

    Lastly, for completeness, all of this code was in a simple static class, and the using statements are:

    using System;
    using System.Collections.Generic;
    using System.Linq;
    using System.Text;
    using ACCESS = Microsoft.Office.Interop.Access; // USED ONLY FOR THE TEXT FILE METHOD
    using DAO = Microsoft.Office.Interop.Access.Dao; // USED ONLY FOR THE DAO METHOD
    using System.Data; // USED ONLY FOR THE ADO.NET/DataTable METHOD
    using System.Data.OleDb; // USED FOR BOTH ADO.NET METHODS
    using System.IO;  // USED ONLY FOR THE TEXT FILE METHOD
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Using .net XsltCompiled transforms, whats the best way to perform date diffs? Is defining
What is the best way to perform a couple of tasks together and if
I started off by drafting a question: What is the best way to perform
What's the best, crossplatform way to perform blackbox tests on AJAX web applications? Ideally,
The best way to store images into MySQL is by storing the image location
What's the best way to perform fulltext searches across rich media files? I'm trying
I was wondering what is the best way to perform a second function after
What is the best way to perform an alphanumeric check on an INPUT field
What's the best way to page the results from a complex query in SQL
What's the best way to reload a tree navigation iframe from within the HTML

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.