Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 735061
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T07:26:43+00:00 2026-05-14T07:26:43+00:00

What is the correct interpretation of the following kernel error message: [N] swapper: page

  • 0

What is the correct interpretation of the following kernel error message:

[N] swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
[N] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.x #15

Is the error fatal (similar to an OOM-kill) or is it just a warning message?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T07:26:44+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:26 am

    It means the kernel tried to allocate memory (2 pages) and failed.

    Whether the error was fatal depends on what component was trying to allocate the memory and if it was a temporary problem or constant one.

    Perhaps if you gave us more information (the entire error, system state when it happened, how frequent, etc), you would get a better answer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is the correct interpretation of the following segfault messages? segfault at 10 ip
What should be the correct interpretation for the sizes of each bit represents :
correct me if any of my following current understanding of c++ is wrong: C++
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a build is a compile, and not every
Correct me if I am wrong, int is 4 bytes, with a range of
Am I correct in assuming that the only difference between "windows files" and "unix
What is the correct way to import a C++ class from a DLL? We're
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but parsing a yyyy/MM/dd (or other specific
Is it correct to link a static library (.lib) compiled with VS 2005 with
Am I correct in assuming that I always need to explicitly deploy referenced assemblies

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.