Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 56081
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:28:43+00:00 2026-05-10T17:28:43+00:00

What is the most elegant way to solve this: open a file for reading,

  • 0

What is the most elegant way to solve this:

  • open a file for reading, but only if it is not already opened for writing
  • open a file for writing, but only if it is not already opened for reading or writing

The built-in functions work like this

>>> path = r'c:\scr.txt' >>> file1 = open(path, 'w') >>> print file1 <open file 'c:\scr.txt', mode 'w' at 0x019F88D8> >>> file2 = open(path, 'w') >>> print file2 <open file 'c:\scr.txt', mode 'w' at 0x02332188> >>> file1.write('111') >>> file2.write('222') >>> file1.close() 

scr.txt now contains ‘111’.

>>> file2.close() 

scr.txt was overwritten and now contains ‘222’ (on Windows, Python 2.4).

The solution should work inside the same process (like in the example above) as well as when another process has opened the file.
It is preferred, if a crashing program will not keep the lock open.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:28:43+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:28 pm

    I don’t think there is a fully crossplatform way. On unix, the fcntl module will do this for you. However on windows (which I assume you are by the paths), you’ll need to use the win32file module.

    Fortunately, there is a portable implementation (portalocker) using the platform appropriate method at the python cookbook.

    To use it, open the file, and then call:

    portalocker.lock(file, flags) 

    where flags are portalocker.LOCK_EX for exclusive write access, or LOCK_SH for shared, read access.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is the most elegant way to implement this function: ArrayList generatePrimes(int n) This
Possible Duplicate: most elegant way to return a string from List<int> I'm not sure
What's the most elegant way of doing something like this: >>> tests = [false,
What is the most elegant way to say this in JS?: search_keyword = search_keyword.toLowerCase();
I'm looking for the most elegant way to parse this. I'm just hitting a
What's the most elegant way to get this array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
Given type erasure, what is the most efficient and elegant way to solve the
What is the most elegant way to identify an error into transaction? At this
What is the most elegant way to perform a loop and stop after the
What is the most elegant way, in your opinion, to print to std::cout using

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.