Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 833141
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T04:28:15+00:00 2026-05-15T04:28:15+00:00

What is the point of lua_lock and lua_unlock? The following implies it’s important: LUA_API

  • 0

What is the point of lua_lock and lua_unlock?

The following implies it’s important:

LUA_API void lua_gettable (lua_State *L, int idx) {
  StkId t;
  lua_lock(L);
  t = index2adr(L, idx);
  api_checkvalidindex(L, t);
  luaV_gettable(L, t, L->top - 1, L->top - 1);
  lua_unlock(L);
}


LUA_API void lua_getfield (lua_State *L, int idx, const char *k) {
  StkId t;
  TValue key;
  lua_lock(L);
  t = index2adr(L, idx);
  api_checkvalidindex(L, t);
  setsvalue(L, &key, luaS_new(L, k));
  luaV_gettable(L, t, &key, L->top);
  api_incr_top(L);
  lua_unlock(L);
}

The following implies it does nothing:

#define lua_lock(L)     ((void) 0) 
#define lua_unlock(L)   ((void) 0)

Please enlighten.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T04:28:16+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:28 am

    If you port Lua to another platform, you are “allowed” to overwrite lua_lock with your own definition; and this definition should essentially be a mutex, to disallow cross-thread operations on the same Lua objects. Essentially, when implemented, it should act similarly to Python’s Global Interpreter Lock (GIL).

    It’s defined to a no-op in vanilla Lua, because vanilla Lua is 100% ANSI-C and runs in a single thread: there’s no need for any locking mechanism to be implemented. However, the developers chose to put the lock statements in there for people who port Lua and implement threading in the interpreter.

    Sources:

    • Proposal: fast lua_lock
    • Why write lua_unlock before lua_lock?
    • Mailing list
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 435k
  • Answers 435k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Instead of: #define unsafe(i) \ ( (i) >= 0 =… May 15, 2026 at 3:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer StuffDooer.Logger = container.Resolve<ILoggerFactory>().GetLogger(typeof(StuffDoer)); If you think it's ugly, that is… May 15, 2026 at 3:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From the man page of write(): A successful return from… May 15, 2026 at 3:34 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.