Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6886799
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T05:48:17+00:00 2026-05-27T05:48:17+00:00

What would be the most efficient way to first generate and then sum a

  • 0

What would be the most efficient way to first generate and then sum a list of random integers in Racket?

I am trying to implement an equivalent of the code in https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/only-fast-languages-are-interesting but I can only come up with slow imlpementations.

My first naive attempt (not random integers, but anyway):

(define (sum-list l)
  (if (null? l)
      0
      (+ (first l) (sum-list (rest l)))))

(define avector 
    (build-vector 3000000 add1))

(time (sum-list avector))

Please note that the efficient part of the code should only be the actual sum of the list, not the generation.

Thanks a lot.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T05:48:17+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 5:48 am

    Here’s a simple version, using `vector’s:

    #lang racket    
    
    (define N 3000000)
    (define avector 
        (for/vector #:length N ([i (in-range N)]) (random)))
    
    (define (sum-vec v)
      (for/fold ([i 0.0]) ([e (in-vector v)]) (+ e i)))
    
    (time (sum-vec avector))
    

    That runs in about 250 ms on my machine.

    If we switch to using flvector:

    #lang racket
    
    (require racket/flonum)
    
    (define N 3000000)
    (define avector 
        (for/flvector #:length N ([i (in-range N)]) (random)))
    
    (define (sum-vec v)
      (for/fold ([i 0.0]) ([e (in-flvector v)]) (+ e i)))
    
    (time (sum-vec avector))
    

    Then it runs in about 60 ms.

    If we change it to use Typed Racket:

    #lang typed/racket
    
    (require racket/flonum)
    
    (define N 3000000)
    (define avector 
        (for/flvector #:length N ([i (in-range N)]) (random)))
    
    (: sum-vec : FlVector -> Float)
    (define (sum-vec v)
      (for/fold ([i 0.0]) ([e (in-flvector v)]) (+ e i)))
    
    (time (sum-vec avector))
    

    Now it runs in about 20 ms.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to figure out the most efficient and scalable way to implement a
I'm trying to figure out the most efficient way to generate a WHERE query.
What would be the most efficient way of turning the first three objects (or
I'm trying to decide what would be the most efficient way to communicate between
What would be the most efficient way of recording to a log (.txt) from
What would be the most efficient way of counting the number of times a
If I have two associative arrays, what would be the most efficient way of
In SQL Server would a varbinary(16) be the most efficient way of storing an
I'm trying to figure out what would be the most efficient (with respect to
What would be the most efficient\elegant way in Python to find the index of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.