Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 262459
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:31:03+00:00 2026-05-11T22:31:03+00:00

When I have an object, removing all references to it is enough to sign

  • 0

When I have an object, removing all references to it is enough to sign it up for the garbage collector, atleast that’s what I heard. Eg.:

removeChild(object);
object = null;

I’m still a bit confused though, because does this mean that the event listeners made inside this object’s instance are also automatically removed? Or is there anything I need to do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:31:03+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:31 pm

    Ah, you’ve hit on the crux of memory management in managed code: if you’re an object, and you have a reference to another object (even if it’s only in the form of an event listener), then you are at least one reason that object won’t be removed from memory during a GC.

    For display objects, and in my experience pretty much anytime you want to subscribe to an event dispatcher but not be responsible for that dispatcher’s remaining in memory, you should add your event listener with the weak reference option:

    myPublisher.addEventListener("myEvent", myHandlerFunction, false, 0, true);
    

    In just about every situation I encounter these days, “false, 0, true” (where true means “use weak reference,” and which translates loosely as “add this listener, but don’t make it a reason for the dispatcher not to get cleared from memory” — see the docs for more information) is the proper way to add event listeners. Very few textbooks or documentation snippets illustrate this approach for some reason, which is unfortunate, because it makes for a much more intuitive memory-management experience. I’d suggest using it as the rule rather than the exception.

    Hope it helps!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For too long I let the garbage collector do its magic, removing all responsibilities
I have two tables: object that has object_id column and avalues that have object_id
I think I read somewhere that some modules only have object oriented interfaces (
I have an object that is mapped to a cookie as a serialized base-64
I have an object in a multi-threaded environment that maintains a collection of information,
Is there any way to find all references to an object (in Java)? I
I have a remoteobject class that handles all interactive with my remote data service.
I have converted an Entity framework project to use POCO objects by removing the
I have object A which in turn has a property of type Object B
I have object A which contains multiple instances of object B, which in turn

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.