Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 178635
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T14:15:56+00:00 2026-05-11T14:15:56+00:00

Which is better (or faster), a C++ for loop or the foreach operator provided

  • 0

Which is better (or faster), a C++ for loop or the foreach operator provided by Qt? For example, the following condition

QList<QString> listofstrings; 

Which is better?

foreach(QString str, listofstrings) {     //code } 

or

int count = listofstrings.count(); QString str = QString(); for(int i=0;i<count;i++) {     str = listofstrings.at(i);     //Code } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T14:15:57+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:15 pm

    It really doesn’t matter in most cases.

    The large number of questions on StackOverflow regarding whether this method or that method is faster, belie the fact that, in the vast majority of cases, code spends most of its time sitting around waiting for users to do something.

    If you are really concerned, profile it for yourself and act on what you find.

    But I think you’ll most likely find that only in the most intense data-processing-heavy work does this question matter. The difference may well be only a couple of seconds and even then, only when processing huge numbers of elements.

    Get your code working first. Then get it working fast (and only if you find an actual performance issue).

    Time spent optimising before you’ve finished the functionality and can properly profile, is mostly wasted time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 88k
  • Answers 88k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is dificult. Depending on what your client wants to… May 11, 2026 at 5:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I take it you can't just Insert into the existing… May 11, 2026 at 5:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Never use CreateObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP") in server side applications.. use CreateObject("MSXML2.ServerXMLHTTP") instead. May 11, 2026 at 5:44 pm

Related Questions

I need to convert several million dates stored as wide strings into boost dates
Briefly: Does anyone know of a GUI for gdb that brings it on par
I had been wondering for quite some time on how to manager memory in
I'm trying to select a column from a single table (no joins) and I

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.