Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6831717
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T22:46:13+00:00 2026-05-26T22:46:13+00:00

Which is more CPU efficient, 1, 2 or 3? key = something.key() id =

  • 0

Which is more CPU efficient, 1, 2 or 3?

key = something.key()
id = something.key().id()

1) db.GqlQuery("select.....").fetch(1)[0]

2) db.get(key)

3) get_by_id(id)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T22:46:14+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 10:46 pm

    Option 1 is less efficient, because it requires a query. Incidentally, note that if you want exactly one result, you can call get() on the Query, which will return the first result, or None if there are none.

    2 and 3 are identical; get_by_id is just syntactic sugar for constructing a key and fetching it with get.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

which is more efficient (when managing over 100K records): A. Mysql SELECT * FROM
Which of the two queries is more efficient? SELECT *FROM Emp WHERE DeptNo<>20 SELECT
Which Join having more I/O and CPU Cycle ? Hash join or Merge join
I am wondering which is more efficient, to store temporary data (related to that
I have a select box which has more than 200 items. Below the select
In the code below, which case (1 or 2) is more efficient? static final
Question of the century? I basically want to know which would be more efficient
Which is more expensive and by how much: List<cards> cardList = getMyList(small);//returns a list
C#: Which uses more memory overhead? A string or a char holding a sequence
We have a servlet which occupies more virtual memory on the server due to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.