Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7907363
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T11:23:39+00:00 2026-06-03T11:23:39+00:00

Which is the recommended Amazon EC2 instance size for creating a large (100k+ users)

  • 0

Which is the recommended Amazon EC2 instance size for creating a large (100k+ users) Ejabberd cluster?

I mean, is it more efficient/less costly to use a larger number of small instances, or a smaller number of large instances?

And are HVM images, for cluster computing, of any use for an Ejabberd cluster, or standard images will be enough for the purpose?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T11:23:40+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 11:23 am

    eJabberd can use lots of memory but doesn’t use a lot of CPU so memory is the biggest consideration. It really depends how many connections you’re talking about. 100k+ connections you will need a large instance at least.

    From MetaJacks blog (The creater of Strophe, the Javascript XMPP library)

    “For Chesspark, we use over a gig of RAM for a few hundred connections. Jabber.org uses about 2.7GB of RAM for its 10k+ connections.”

    A large instance has 7.5GB of RAM, which isn’t enough for 100k+ connections. I’d say you’re looking at a 2-3 server cluster of Large instances or a High Memory Instance.

    HVM is only really needed when you need hardware support that is not provided by the software virtual machine (e.g. Graphics card processing). Not required for Memory or CPU.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is the recommended library for python to do everything that is Amazon EC2
I am using a PHP Amazon S3 Class (which seems to be highly recommended
How can I open a dialog window in Qt/PyQt with a recommended size which
I am creating a web service for end users which will have a front-end
Which one is recommended considering readability, memory usage, other reasons? 1. String strSomething1 =
Which role is recommended for an ORACLE user used internally by an desktop or
Can someone advice which is the recommended version of Java Runtime Environment for Windows
I'd like to know which method is recommended on Windows C programming: using malloc
Is there a collation type which is officially recommended by MySQL, for a general
Any recommended practices for cleaning up header spaghetti which is causing extremely slow compilation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.