Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1049779
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T16:40:13+00:00 2026-05-16T16:40:13+00:00

Why are async callback socket methods usually static? (assume I understand static class, method

  • 0

Why are async callback socket methods usually static? (assume I understand static class, method and data objects). Would there be a fundamental design/logic error if one were to write a class using these as instance methods? Is there anything special that one should be careful to avoid?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T16:40:13+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:40 pm

    There is no specific reason that they should be static. It all depends on your design.

    If the callback needs to access members in the class then it can be declared as a instance member. However, you will need to make sure that you correctly syncronize the access to the instance members because the callback can be invoked concurrently from different threads.

    I guess the examples you looked at all passed the required data through to the callback through the IAsyncResult.AsyncState so did not require additional information from the class. If you can do this it can simplify your code, since you no longer need to worry about thread syncronization etc..

    Update

    Just to clarify, based on the comments it seems I should have beed more explicit. It is not that the static callback would be thread safe, but rather that in a design where the data required is passed to the callback and of course this data is not shared by other threads then locking is not required. And since the callback is passed all the data it requires, it does not need access to the class instance and can therefore be made static.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have async methods that returns an objects public static IEnumerable<Users.User> GetUsers(IEnumerable<string> uids, Field
I use the async BeginReceive method of System.Net.Sockets.Socket. This requires a callback to an
I have some async method public static Task<JObject> GetUser(NameValueCollection parameters) { return CallMethodApi(users.get, parameters,
I have a receive callback from an async client method that is supposed to
At the first look when using asynchronous methods on the socket level, there shouldn't
i would like some info on the following: Socket.BeginSend Method (array<Byte>[]()[], Int32, Int32, SocketFlags,
In my WPF application I do some async communication (with server). In the callback
Consider the following code: class Foo { // boring parts omitted private TcpClient socket;
Would this work? Socket someUdpSocket = new Socket(...); EndPoint[] aLotOfClients = { ... };
the following is part of a socket class that im working on. what i

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.