Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 206729
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:40:19+00:00 2026-05-11T17:40:19+00:00

With at-rules, it’s possible to have a ruleset for elements during that at-rule event

  • 0

With at-rules, it’s possible to have a ruleset for elements during that at-rule event (like printing, mobile devices, etc.) But what about just for a specific selector?

I am working on a sub page of a larger site, and I have to use the master stylesheet for any of my pages. Sometimes a style rule just gets trumped by a rule from the master style sheet. To overcome this, I end up having to add “#mypage #content blah blah” before all of my rules to ensure my css is more specific. It gets messy very fast. What I’d prefer to do is something like:

@#mypage {
       div {
           border: 1px solid #000;
           }
       div p {
           color: #00f;
           }
       }

so that any rules I make up are contained to the id of the section of the page I am working on.

Oh, I forgot to mention, I can’t (as far as I understand) use @namespace, as my page is within a template frame (hence the need for the master stylesheet), so if I just say @namespace (my-page-url) my stylesheet would overwrite the master stylesheet.

Am I missing something simple?


Clarification:

Sorry, I guess in my attempt to stay simple I was too vague…

I am developing the content of a page which will be placed inside of a more generic template (masthead, sidebar navigation, etc) which has a global style sheet and I have no control over any of that content.

I have some liberty with the stylesheet for just my section. I don’t want any my rules to accidentally overwrite the global stylesheet, and I want to avoid having to use really long selectors for my rules to avoid the global stylesheet overwriting my stylesheet. For example, if I want to say

“all tables have a black border”

I risk putting a black border around some table in the sidebar. However, if I say

“all tables within the div #content have a black border”

this only works as long as they don’t have a more specific rule.

Now, I can go through each rule and add a long train of selectors to ensure that each of my rules works and only for my section, but that’s not really attractive or fun to do. I was hoping that I could nest all of my rules inside of a larger rule, like in my example above, so that I can have a main rule:

  #content {

    //and place all of my style rules inside of that:



 p {
     border: pink;
   }

so that I only have to declare my specificity once and it covers every rule inside that main rule.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:40:20+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:40 pm

    From what I’ve read the following rule fits the bill, is only one level deep, and is frankly typical of most websites I’ve seen and used:

    #content div {
      ... your rules ...
    }
    

    That would only effect divs which are under the element with the id of content.

    There’s no way to “group” these rules as so:

    #content {
      div {
        ... your rules ...
      }
    }
    

    That would be nice, but alas, it’s not the way it was written.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 106k
  • Answers 106k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer div#container { height: 275px; width: 1000px; overflow: auto; white-space: nowrap;… May 11, 2026 at 8:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Read the suggestion by mmyers; I googled for "custom creation… May 11, 2026 at 8:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Of course reverse engineering is possible, but without format specs… May 11, 2026 at 8:50 pm

Related Questions

I decide to learn more about vim and its syntax highlighting. Using examples for
I'm trying to adhere to the VS2005 code analysis rules for a new project.
I have been puzzling over a problem this morning with LinqToSQL. I'll try and
I am trying to create a rewrite rule that accomplishes two things: Redirect (www.)?domain.com
I a modeling a system to evaluate expressions. Now the operands in these expressions

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.