Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7919709
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T15:57:19+00:00 2026-06-03T15:57:19+00:00

Consider this code _bindEvents: -> @input.bind ‘keyup’, => @filter($(this).val()) if $this .val() is ”

  • 0

Consider this code

 _bindEvents: ->
  @input.bind 'keyup', =>
    @filter($(this).val())
    if $this .val() is ''
      @clearBtn.hide()
    else
      @clearBtn.show()

it’s clear to me that ‘@’ represents ‘_this.’ so it references the parent scope, but what if i need the ‘inner this’.

Like this line:

@filter($(this).val())

compiles to this:

_this.filter($(_this).val()); // $(_this)

and I need this:

_this.filter($(this).val());  // $(this)

Is there a way to do that without using the thin arrow and saving the this reference by hand using a closue (that = this)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T15:57:20+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 3:57 pm

    AFAIK there’s no way to do that; and I would warn against it for a couple reasons:

    • ease-of-understanding: When you use a hash rocket (=>), you’re effectively telling the reader that you need/want to preserve the current value of this; re-introducing a second this confuses that.

    • future-compatibility: From my understanding, the next ECMAScript spec is to support => in a way that it doesn’t even introduce a new this. (And I wouldn’t be surprised if CoffeeScript directly adopts the new
      arrow syntax when that feature lands)

    A thin arrow w/ explicit referencing will probably make things more clear in the end.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider this code: new Ajax.Request('?service=example', { parameters : {tags : 'exceptions'}, onSuccess : this.dataReceived.bind(this)
Consider this code sample: public abstract class Parent { public int val; public Parent()
Consider this code: <tr> <td> <input type=checkbox name=20081846 value=20081846 class=chk-input> </td> <td>20081846</td> <td>AGONOY, JAY
Consider this code: class Foo[T : Manifest](val id: String = manifest[T].erasure.getName) I basically want
Consider this code : HTML: <table> <tr> <td>Option 1</td> <td><input type='checkbox' id='option1' /></td> </tr>
Consider this code: public <T> List<T> meth(List<?> type) { System.out.println(type); // 1 return new
Consider this code: import socket store = [] scount = 0 while True: scount+=1
Consider this code: int main() { int e; prn(e); return 0; } void prn(double
Consider this code: void res(int a,int n) { printf(%d %d, ,a,n); } void main(void)
Consider this code: int x = 17; int y = 013; System.out.println(x+y = +

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.