Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7489353
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T15:14:05+00:00 2026-05-29T15:14:05+00:00

Consider this situation: void doSmth1(std::map<int,int> const& m); void doSmth2(std::map<int,int> const& m) { std::map<int,int> m2

  • 0

Consider this situation:

void doSmth1(std::map<int,int> const& m);

void doSmth2(std::map<int,int> const& m) {
  std::map<int,int> m2 = m;
  m2[42] = 47;
  doSmth1(m2);
}

The idea is that doSmth2 will call doSmth1 and forward the map it received from its caller. However, it has to add one additional key-value pair (or override it if it is already there). I would like to avoid copying the whole thing just to pass an additional value to doSmth1.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T15:14:05+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 3:14 pm

    You can’t do that with the standard map. But if your problem is that specific, you might consider passing the new element separately:

    void doSmth1(std::map<int, int> const & m, int newkey, int newvalue);
    
    void doSmth2(std::map<int, int> const & m)
    {
        doSmth1(m, 42, 47);
    }
    

    Update: If you really just want one map, and copying the map is out of the question, then here’s how you can implement @arrowdodger’s suggestion to make a temporary modification to the original map:

    void doSmth2(std::map<int, int> & m)
    {
        auto it = m.find(42);
    
        if (it == m.end())
        {
            m.insert(std::make_pair(42, 49));
            doSmth1(m);
            m.erase(42);
        }
        else
        {
            auto original = it->second;
            it->second = 49;
            doSmth1(m);
            it->second = original;
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just wondering whether an object can self-destruct. Consider this situation. An object that extends
Just wondering whether an object can self-destruct. Consider this situation. An object that extends
This is a complex question, please consider carefully before answering. Consider this situation. Two
Consider this case: dll = LoadDLL() dll->do() ... void do() { char *a =
consider this code block public void ManageInstalledComponentsUpdate() { IUpdateView view = new UpdaterForm(); BackgroundWorker
Consider this example table (assuming SQL Server 2005): create table product_bill_of_materials ( parent_product_id int
Consider this code (Java, specifically): public int doSomething() { doA(); try { doB(); }
Consider the following situation: class MyFoo { public: MyFoo(); ~MyFoo(); void doSomething(void); private: unsigned
Consider this situation: Begin transaction Insert 20 records into a table with an auto_increment
Consider this situation: There's a critical VB6 desktop application running on a production box.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.