Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7308133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T23:30:56+00:00 2026-05-28T23:30:56+00:00

given the following two Constraints @NotNull @Pattern (pattern=foobar) private String myFooBarMember; Is there a

  • 0

given the following two Constraints

@NotNull
@Pattern (pattern="foobar")
private String myFooBarMember;

Is there a possibility, if the first one matched (=returned an error) (@NotNull) to not evaluate the second one (@Pattern)? or does JSR303 always evaluate all Constraints? If there is a possibility to not evaluate the second after a first match, please state how this can be done.

Thank you very much!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T23:30:57+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 11:30 pm

    Well, I’m not a JSR 303 specialist, but I’ve found the following excerpts from the 1.0 FR:

    2.3. Constraint composition

    Note:

    If a composing constraint fails and if the composed constraint is
    marked as @ReportAsSingleViolation, the Bean Validation provider is
    free to not process the other composing constraints for this composed
    constraint.

    and:

    3.5. Validation routine

    • for all reachable fields, execute all field level validations (including the ones expressed on superclasses) matching the targeted
      group unless the given validation constraint has already been
      processed during this validation routine for a given navigation path
      (see Section 3.5.1) as part of a previous group match.

    So from the latter, I’d say that by default all validators will be executed.

    From the former, I’d say that this (constraint composition) would be one way to achieve what you want. Although it might (and probably is) dependent on the Bean Validation implementor, so you’d need to read some proprietary docs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the following simple example: List<string> list = new List<string>() { One, Two, Three,
Given the following two queries, which one would be faster (in theory) if there
Given the following strings 7;#User One 7;#User Two;#9;#User Two 7;#User Two;#9;#User Two;#123;#User Three I
Given the following HTML example... <div id='div1'>div one</div> <div id='div2'>div two</div> ...I found that
Given the following two code options, is there any performance benefit (over a very
Given the following two entities : class Parent { @OneToMany(cascade=CascadeType.ALL) private Set<Child> children; (...)
Given the following two cases, which one is preferable (If they're both bad, doing
Is there a difference between the following two snippets for this given class? class
Given the following two ways of defining a class method in Ruby: class Foo
Problem Given the following two tables, I'd like to select all Ids for Posts

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.