Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8758979
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T14:41:08+00:00 2026-06-13T14:41:08+00:00

I Don’t get why this code blocks. I use nodejs async functions, but now

  • 0

I Don’t get why this code blocks. I use nodejs async functions, but now I’m trying to figure out what’s the essence of non-blocking programming, and how can I implement those.
This is the way I thought it would be, but Its still blocking.

   var async_func = function(x, func) {
        func(x+5);
    };

    setTimeout( async_func(5, function(number) {
        for (var x = 0; x < 1000000000; x++) {;}
        console.log(number);
    }), 3000);

    console.log("done");
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T14:41:09+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 2:41 pm

    This is a common mistake when using setTimeout() and when passing function references where you want to call a function with arguments. This line of code:

    setTimeout( async_func(5, function(number) {
    

    executes async_func() immediately and then passes it’s return result (which is not a function) to setTimeout() and that is NOT what you want. You want to pass a function reference to setTimeout() so setTimeout() can call that function later like this:

    var async_func = function(x, func) {
        func(x+5);
    };
    
    setTimeout( function() {
        async_func(5, function(number) {
            for (var x = 0; x < 1000000000; x++) {;}
            console.log(number);
        });
    }, 3000);
    
    console.log("done");    
    

    or, sometimes it’s easier to understand by making your timer callback function it’s own separate function with no arguments.

    function async_func(x, func) {
        func(x+5);
    }
    
    function timer_func() {
        async_func(5, function(number) {
            for (var x = 0; x < 1000000000; x++) {;}
            console.log(number);
        });
    }
    
    setTimeout(timer_func, 3000);
    
    console.log("done");    
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I don't know why, but this code worked for me a month ago... maybe
Don't know how to explain it better but i'm trying to get a response
Don't know if I'm over-thinking this or not.. but I'm trying to be able
Don't ask me why but i can't use this method because I need to
Don't need to do this right now but thinking about the future... What would
don't know better title for this, but here's my code. I have class user
Don't know how to frase this but I found this code wich works as
don't know if the title describes anything about what I'm trying to say but
I don't know if this question is trivial or not. But after a couple
Don't know if this is the right place to ask this, but I will

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.