Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3270884
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T18:40:44+00:00 2026-05-17T18:40:44+00:00

I have a multi-threaded application that has a centrlaised list that is updated (written

  • 0

I have a multi-threaded application that has a centrlaised list that is updated (written to) only by the main thread. I then have several other threads that need to periodically retrieve the list in its current state. Is there a method that can allow me to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T18:40:45+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 6:40 pm

    That depends on how you want to restrict the concurrency. The easiest way is probably using CopyOnWriteArrayList. When you grab an iterator from it, that iterator will mirror how the list looked at the point in time when the iterator was created – subsequent modifications will not be visible to the iterator. The upside is that it can cope with quite a lot of contention, the drawback is that adding new items is rather expensive.

    The other way of doing is locking, the simplest way is probably wrapping the list with Collections.synchronizedList and synchronizing on the list when iterating.

    A third way is using some kind of BlockingQueue and feed the new elements to the workers.

    Edit: As the OP stated only a snapshot is needed, CopyOnWriteArrayList is probably the best out-of-the-box alternative. An alternative (for cheaper adding, but costlier reading) is just creating a copy of a synchronizedList when traversion is needed (copy-on-read rather than copy-on-write):

    List<Foo> originalList = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList());
    
    public void mainThread() {
        while(true)
            originalList.add(getSomething());
    }
    
    public void workerThread() {
        while(true) {
            List<Foo> copiedList;
            synchronized (originalList) {
                 copiedList = originalList.add(something);
            }
            for (Foo f : copiedList) process(f);
        }
    }
    

    Edit: Come to think of it, the copy-on-read version could simplified a bit to avoid all synchronized blocks:

    List<Foo> originalList = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList());
    
    public void mainThread() {
        while(true)
            originalList.add(getSomething());
    }
    
    public void workerThread() {
        while(true) {
            for (Foo f : originalList.toArray(new Foo[0])) 
                process(f);
        }
    }
    

    Edit 2: Here’s a simple wrapper for a copy-on-read list which doesn’t use any helpers, and which tries to be as fine-grained in the locking as possible (I’ve deliberately made it somewhat excessive, bordering on suboptimal, to demonstrate where locking is needed):

    class CopyOnReadList<T> {
    
        private final List<T> items = new ArrayList<T>();
    
        public void add(T item) {
            synchronized (items) {
                // Add item while holding the lock.
                items.add(item);
            }
        }
    
        public List<T> makeSnapshot() {
            List<T> copy = new ArrayList<T>();
            synchronized (items) {
                // Make a copy while holding the lock.
                for (T t : items) copy.add(t);
            }
            return copy;
        }
    
    }
    
    // Usage:
    CopyOnReadList<String> stuff = new CopyOnReadList<String>();
    stuff.add("hello");
    for (String s : stuff.makeSnapshot())
        System.out.println(s);
    

    Basically, when you to lock when you:

    1. … add an item to the list.
    2. … iterate over the list to make a copy of it.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a multi-threaded Windows application that occasionally deadlocks. Inevitably this happens on a
I have a multi-threaded application that is using pthreads. I have a mutex() lock
I have a multi-threaded Delphi 6 Pro application that I am currently working on
OK, so I have a very large multi-threaded unmanaged c++ application (server) that runs
I currently have heavily multi-threaded server application, and I'm shopping around for a good
I have a .NET (C#) multi-threaded application and I want to know if a
Let's say I have a container (std::vector) of pointers used by a multi-threaded application.
In a C# windows forms application. I have a splash screen with some multi-threaded
I have a multi-threaded Windows C++ app written in Visual Studio 6. Within the
I have an object in a multi-threaded environment that maintains a collection of information,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.