Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9058691
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T14:47:17+00:00 2026-06-16T14:47:17+00:00

I have the following scenario: async void DoStuff() { // … } button1.Click +=

  • 0

I have the following scenario:

async void DoStuff() {
    // ...
}

button1.Click += (s, p) => {
    DoStuff();
};

I’m not sure what happens when I call an async void method while the first call is still incomplete.
Will the call create a new thread everytime it is called or will the call destroy and override the previous thread created? Also, will the local method variables be shared if the former assumption is right?

EDITED:

I had misunderstood the async await thing because in windows 8 apps, it behaves differently. If you thought that calling an async method was the same as creating a new thread like me, please read this clarifying aricle.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T14:47:19+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 2:47 pm

    I’m not sure what happens when I call an async void method more than once at the same time

    You mean if another call occurs while the first call is still incomplete (potentially “paused”)? It will work just fine. There’s no “overriding”, no “destroying”. You’ll end up with another instance of the state machine (which is what the compiler builds for you).

    The two state machines will have entirely separate local variables etc. Of course, only one of them can actually run at a time, unless somewhere in the async method you avoid capturing the context.

    Don’t forget that starting an async method doesn’t start a new thread. Some async operations you start within the async method may start new threads, but that’s a different matter. Nothing within the generated code creates a new thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following scenario. The client code only has access to FooHandler, not
I have the following scenario, class foo { ... private: char *_test; }; void
I have a following scenario, void* Refresh(void *) { usleep(10); .. } static void
I am trying to understand isolation/locks in SQL Server. I have following scenario in
I have the following scenario: in activity A, when a user clicks a button,
I have the following scenario: if(xml.Descendants(ns + Children).FirstOrDefault() != null) { XElement children =
I have the following scenario, a Customer who can have bank accounts in several
I have the following scenario :- template <typename T> class Base { public: virtual
I have the following scenario: Entities are loaded from the database. One of them
I have the following scenario where I want to pass in string and a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.