Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7432941
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T09:32:14+00:00 2026-05-29T09:32:14+00:00

I have this code : for (var i = 0; i < result.length; i++)

  • 0

I have this code :

for (var i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
    // call a function that open a new "thread"
    myObject.geocode({ param1: "param" }, function(results, status) {
        alert(result.title[i]);
    });                                             
}

The .geocode function (that is not mine, so I can’t edit) open a new “thread” of execution.

When I try to print title on each step, I get always the last possible value of i.

How can I keep a reference to the right value of i for each iteration?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T09:32:16+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 9:32 am

    You can create a closure within the loop;

    for (var i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
        // call a function that open a new "thread"
        (function (i) {
            myObject.geocode({ param1: "param" }, function(results, status) {
                alert(result.title[i]);
            });
        }(i));                                             
    }
    

    So here we’re creating a function;

    (function (i) {
        myObject.geocode({ param1: "param" }, function(results, status) {
            alert(result.title[i]);
        });
    });
    

    … which accepts one parameter named i, and launches the geocode request. By adding the (i) to the end of the declaration of a function expression, we run the function straight away and pass it the current value of i.

    (function (i) {
        myObject.geocode({ param1: "param" }, function(results, status) {
            alert(result.title[i]);
        });
    }(i));
    

    It doesn’t matter that a variable i already exists at a higher scope than the closure, because the local declaration of i overrides it. Either the variable we pass to the closure, or the name the closure calls the variable could be different;

    (function (anotherVariable) {
        myObject.geocode({ param1: "param" }, function(results, status) {
            alert(result.title[anotherVariable]);
        });
    }(aVariable));
    

    Alternately you could also extract the logic to another function (I prefer it, but it’s less cool):

    function geocode(i) {
       myObject.geocode({ param1: "param" }, function(results, status) {
           alert(result.title[i]);
       });
    }
    
    for (var i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
        geocode(i);                                            
    }
    

    The problem is down to the same i variable being used by the callback functions; which, as you’ve discovered, has moved on by the time the callback executes. Both of the above solutions creates another variable for each iteration, and it is this that the callback operates on.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i have this code: var list = new List<int>(); for(int i=0;i<10;i++) list.Add(i); for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
Suppose I have this code: var myArray = new Object(); myArray["firstname"] = "Bob"; myArray["lastname"]
Imagine I have this code: var myFunc1 = function(event) { alert(1); } var myFunc2
I have this piece of code: var myObj = function () { this.complex =
I have this code : var dp:Array = new Array(); for ( var i:int
I have this JS code: var recipesPost = function(name, ingredients, steps) { $.post('/api/recipes', {
i have this code: function getData(){ db.transaction(function(tx){ tx.executeSql('SELECT * from q', [], function(tx, result){
I have this code: var $msg = jQuery('<div></div>') .hide() .appendTo(document.body) ; if ($msg.is(:hidden)) {
I have this code: var totalAmt=0; for (i in orders) { order=orders[i]; if (order.status
Ok, I have this code: var room = [ { time: 0, people: 0

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.