Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8267013
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T05:22:16+00:00 2026-06-08T05:22:16+00:00

I often see code of the form RSpec.configure do |config| config.include ApiHelper # ##

  • 0

I often see code of the form

RSpec.configure do |config|
  config.include ApiHelper

  # ## Mock Framework
  #
  # If you prefer to use mocha, flexmock or RR, uncomment the appropriate line:
  #
  # config.mock_with :mocha
  # config.mock_with :flexmock
  # config.mock_with :rr

  # Remove this line if you're not using ActiveRecord or ActiveRecord fixtures
  config.fixture_path = "#{::Rails.root}/spec/fixtures"

  # If you're not using ActiveRecord, or you'd prefer not to run each of your
  # examples within a transaction, remove the following line or assign false
  # instead of true.
  config.use_transactional_fixtures = true

  # If true, the base class of anonymous controllers will be inferred
  # automatically. This will be the default behavior in future versions of
  # rspec-rails.
  config.infer_base_class_for_anonymous_controllers = false

  config.include FactoryGirl::Syntax::Methods

end

Is there a feature in Rails that lets me do something similar? I want to be able to configure my own library with a similar syntax within config/initializers/my_class.rb

MyClass.configure do |config|
  # allow configuration here
end
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T05:22:18+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 5:22 am

    i don’t know if rails provides a helper for that, but i wrote my own tiny solution for this problem that i use in several gems: https://github.com/phoet/confiture

    it let’s you define configurations:

    module Your
      class Configuration
        include Confiture::Configuration
    
        confiture_allowed_keys(:secret, :key)
        confiture_defaults(secret: 'SECRET_STUFF', key: 'EVEN_MOAR_SECRET')
      end
    end
    

    and have an easy api to do the configuration:

    Your::Configuration.configure do |config|
      config.secret = 'your-secret'
      config.key    = 'your-key'
    end
    

    besides this, there are a lot of other config tools out there like configatron or simpleconfig.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In python code I often see the use of @property. If I understand correctly,
I often see code a function defined without visibility keywords. e.g: class Foo() {
I often see code like int hashCode(){ return a^b; } Why XOR?
I often see the code like this: public abstract class AbstractDataReader { public void
Often I see javascript code where event handlers (like onmousemove) are assigned dynamically. Example:
I often see a pattern used in circumstances where we have look-up code that
I have an example of some code that I see often in websites that
I often see JavaScript code which checks for undefined parameters etc. this way: if
I often see code such as the following when, e.g., representing a large bitmap
I often see code like this: // Approach 1 if(data != nil){ // Do

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.