Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8263231
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T04:01:46+00:00 2026-06-08T04:01:46+00:00

I want extend a new JS object while creation with other object passing a

  • 0

I want extend a new JS object while creation with other object passing a parameter.
This code does not work, because I only can extend object without dynamic parameter.

otherObject = function(id1){
    this.id = id1;
};

otherObject.prototype.test =function(){
    alert(this.id);
};

testObject = function(id2) {
    this.id=id2;
};

testObject.prototype = new otherObject("id2");/* id2 should be testObject this.id */


var a = new testObject("variable");
a.test();

Any suggestion?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T04:01:47+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 4:01 am

    Apart from the obvious syntax error, the correct JavaScript way of inheritance is this:

    // constructors are named uppercase by convention
    function OtherObject(id1) {
        this.id = id1;
    };
    OtherObject.prototype.test = function() {
        alert(this.id);
    };
    
    function TestObject(id2) {
        // call "super" constructor on this object:
        OtherObject.call(this, id2);
    };
    // create a prototype object inheriting from the other one
    TestObject.prototype = Object.create(OtherObject.prototype);
    // if you want them to be equal (share all methods), you can simply use
    TestObject.prototype = OtherObject.prototype;
    
    
    var a = new TestObject("variable");
    a.test(); // alerts "variable"
    

    You will find lots of tutorials about this on the web.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to extend RuntimeException to create this specific exception: class CompileLinkException extends RuntimeException
As I use Notepad++ daily at work, I want to extend it to be
Folks I have a sealed class as follows. I want to extend this sealed
In the following code i tried to extend my test plugin. I want to
I want to create an call recorder application in blackberry. While searching in this
If I want to create a new object that needs certain informations like a
I want to extend Ion Auth to only allow certain email addresses to register.
I want to extend a web server which is only able to handle RPC
I want to extend the IEnumerable class but only for types that can be
I want to extend the functionality of a part of a program that I'm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.