Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1003655
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T08:00:46+00:00 2026-05-16T08:00:46+00:00

Is it correct to catch each exception with Exception class ??? If not then

  • 0

Is it correct to catch each exception with Exception class ??? If not then what should be the correct sequence to catch exception within try catch block?

e.g

try{
       .
       .
       some code
       .
   }
   catch(Exception ex)
   {
       throw ex;
   }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T08:00:47+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:00 am

    No, this is wrong.

    1. Catching only to throw again is pointless.

    2. It’s rethrowing incorrectly, which leads to losing the stack trace. The right way to rethrow (when rethrowing makes sense, that is), is simply: throw;

    3. If you want to catch one exception and then throw another, you should keep the first one as an inner exception of the second. This is done by passing it in to the constructor.

    Bottom line: Only catch the exceptions that you know what to do with.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 493k
  • Answers 493k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Why not do 'document.location = pluginurl' or "googlechrome.exe pluginurl" May 16, 2026 at 10:51 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Aborting a thread is usually a measure of last resort.… May 16, 2026 at 10:51 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You never have to. If the recipient however, is unable… May 16, 2026 at 10:51 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I'm wondering what the correct way is to pass on an exception from one
I have a Java program with code: public class Test1 { public static void
i have some business logic that traps some logically invalid situations, e.g. trying to
public class DrawView extends View { private ColorBall[] colorballs = new ColorBall[3]; // array
I have the following method in my code: private bool GenerateZipFile(List<FileInfo> filesToArchive, DateTime archiveDate)
I have 2 matrices and I need to multiply them and then print the
Say I am rolling out a CMS. Each user gets their own page at
I have an application written in VB.NET ( NOT asp.net, it is a Windows
Is it correct that a instance method can be called on a null reference
I am trying to implement an OutOfStockException for when the user attempts to buy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.